IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] Eric Rescorla's Discuss on draft-ietf-rtcweb-overview-18: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com> Thu, 11 May 2017 07:45 UTC

Return-Path: <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94076129AC9; Thu, 11 May 2017 00:45:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.221
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.221 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IJORgFQ8oRFA; Thu, 11 May 2017 00:45:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sessmg22.ericsson.net (sessmg22.ericsson.net [193.180.251.58]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 671411274D2; Thu, 11 May 2017 00:45:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb3a-f56d89a000005025-82-5914167fe405
Received: from ESESSHC017.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.183.69]) by sessmg22.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 85.3E.20517.F7614195; Thu, 11 May 2017 09:45:03 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from ESESSMB109.ericsson.se ([169.254.9.104]) by ESESSHC017.ericsson.se ([153.88.183.69]) with mapi id 14.03.0339.000; Thu, 11 May 2017 09:44:02 +0200
From: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
To: Sean Turner <sean@sn3rd.com>
CC: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, "rtcweb-chairs@ietf.org" <rtcweb-chairs@ietf.org>, "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-rtcweb-overview@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-rtcweb-overview@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [rtcweb] Eric Rescorla's Discuss on draft-ietf-rtcweb-overview-18: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
Thread-Index: AQHSu1nlcZL8BStkfUysDoOyMAqI5qHTV0EQgAODp4CAGBVbgA==
Date: Thu, 11 May 2017 07:44:00 +0000
Message-ID: <D539F225.1C532%christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
References: <149285978295.25905.7347383325486705546.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B4CB805F3@ESESSMB109.ericsson.se> <15D737F9-2F65-45C5-AA26-946910B4030F@sn3rd.com>
In-Reply-To: <15D737F9-2F65-45C5-AA26-946910B4030F@sn3rd.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.7.2.170228
x-originating-ip: [153.88.183.20]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-ID: <3C4F8E4392172947910720694E289526@ericsson.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFtrJIsWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyM2K7q269mEikwYxdshZbXp9gs1jx+hy7 xYw/E5ktet7eYLFY+6+d3eLKqkZmBzaPJUt+MnlMftzG7HHwIGMAcxSXTUpqTmZZapG+XQJX xuSp+xgLlnJVvP7Zw9jAuIuji5GTQ0LAROLsnx3sXYxcHEICRxglPj7pYYRwljBK7Fu+FMjh 4GATsJDo/qcN0iAioCDRdPQBK0gNs8BTRok1L9vBaoQFciQeHmOBqMmVuLlhJpTtJPG44TaY zSKgKrF/zndGEJtXwFqi78MbNrjFi76vYwdJcArYSnz+tZUZxGYUEJP4fmoNE4jNLCAucevJ fCaIqwUkluw5zwxhi0q8fPyPFcQWFdCT2PfvKxtEXFHi6vTlUL16EjemTmGDsK0l3l2bxgJh a0ssW/iaGeIgQYmTM5+wTGAUn4Vk3Swk7bOQtM9C0j4LSfsCRtZVjKLFqcXFuelGRnqpRZnJ xcX5eXp5qSWbGIERenDLb6sdjAefOx5iFOBgVOLhfSAjHCnEmlhWXJl7iFGCg1lJhHeSqEik EG9KYmVValF+fFFpTmrxIUZpDhYlcV6HfRcihATSE0tSs1NTC1KLYLJMHJxSDYxmbHfyT7Pv TJxfV37ttORV36sZUo6uIWvdnh3bazU1f3pC9uHz3uUHy78Xnmr9Wjlh81KrUvPKmfs8uPNZ r27x2NLKd37C3ZMntSY/rOthP7J35o5/U0rLF7/Nqb06af1r9s+blDq2h/r1vr41V8dsVuJV /1SP61v1FylZLP+/0SIswvnNlX0LlViKMxINtZiLihMBUHcboMwCAAA=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/nl0oB-fcoeDwj8CXO_DCs1ulFZA>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Eric Rescorla's Discuss on draft-ietf-rtcweb-overview-18: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 May 2017 07:45:08 -0000

Hi,

What is the status regarding this?

Regards,

Christer

On 26/04/17 06:02, "Sean Turner" <sean@sn3rd.com> wrote:

>
>> On Apr 23, 2017, at 14:44, Christer Holmberg
>><christer.holmberg@ericsson.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> DISCUSS:
>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> 
>>> Your citation to ICE is to 5245-bis, but at least the JSEP editor
>>>consensus was that WebRTC depended on 5245, so this needs to be
>>>resolved one way or the other.
>> 
>> Keep in mind that, no matter what draft-rtcweb-overview and
>>draft-rtcweb-jsep explicitly say, both specs reference 5245bis
>>*IMPLICITLY*, e.g., via draft-mmusic-bundle, draft-ice-trickle etc... As
>>I have indicated in the past, it would cause confusion to reference both.
>> 
>> So, I think we shall reference 5245-bis everywhere (I also thought we
>>already decided no that in the past)-
>> 
>> Regards,
>> 
>> Christer
>
>/* bike shed alert:
>/* 
>/* Assuming you¹re of the mind that a bis/updates draft is
>/* signaling to all implementors of the original RFC that the
>/* intention is that all implementations be updated then it¹s
>/* a bit more than implicit.
>
>spt
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email