Re: [rtcweb] I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtcweb-audio-02.txt

"Mo Zanaty (mzanaty)" <mzanaty@cisco.com> Fri, 06 September 2013 21:42 UTC

Return-Path: <mzanaty@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30E0111E80F1 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 Sep 2013 14:42:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Znbu4FPtUYeu for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 Sep 2013 14:42:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com [173.37.86.73]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E060C11E8108 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Fri, 6 Sep 2013 14:42:07 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1102; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1378503728; x=1379713328; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=zJ0pFrg29f4PU2sekORfpQonOD9yFseNKBIUhb5J2PI=; b=TgeQ9mryCJD/I9/DLKN8tcQ9MHOCoKovUwPRcDqBJ4iWfS/PfZyfZHIg DR/OqJjkGPeUJzL2MCYwY1/0Xn3bFydzLx3VGFiHJn3LwWXXtnoDZ8Hwe V4+28ZSNoJH2OQwXZeTRP0dQuwLLGJLnyivvolov5qcMQU75YDC0S4/lt 8=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Aj8FAMJLKlKtJV2b/2dsb2JhbABbgweBBoJjR742F4EPFnSCJAEBAQQjEUUMBAIBCBEEAQEBAgIGHQMCAgIfERQBCAgCBA4FCIdoAw+sKYglDYh7gSmLZYI9MQcGgmM0gQADlgyOIIUvgyCCKg
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.90,857,1371081600"; d="scan'208";a="256635356"
Received: from rcdn-core-4.cisco.com ([173.37.93.155]) by rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 06 Sep 2013 21:42:07 +0000
Received: from xhc-aln-x09.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x09.cisco.com [173.36.12.83]) by rcdn-core-4.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r86Lg7F4020462 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Fri, 6 Sep 2013 21:42:07 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x14.cisco.com ([169.254.4.101]) by xhc-aln-x09.cisco.com ([173.36.12.83]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.004; Fri, 6 Sep 2013 16:42:07 -0500
From: "Mo Zanaty (mzanaty)" <mzanaty@cisco.com>
To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Thread-Topic: [rtcweb] I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtcweb-audio-02.txt
Thread-Index: AQHOqzHVCTCNRbUxykmV6tr8IYwOK5m5JCLwgABbRAD//7U6sA==
Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2013 21:42:06 +0000
Message-ID: <3879D71E758A7E4AA99A35DD8D41D3D91D527209@xmb-rcd-x14.cisco.com>
References: <20130802162957.17108.79281.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <BBE9739C2C302046BD34B42713A1E2A22DF83C31@ESESSMB105.ericsson.se> <522A23C1.2030900@mozilla.com> <3879D71E758A7E4AA99A35DD8D41D3D91D527148@xmb-rcd-x14.cisco.com> <CABkgnnXo3BWLgsbgHi+MArc6xhOQ=vw3MFtA176=ngOh2nYdMA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABkgnnXo3BWLgsbgHi+MArc6xhOQ=vw3MFtA176=ngOh2nYdMA@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.150.29.189]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtcweb-audio-02.txt
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2013 21:42:14 -0000

True. The same can be said about every SHOULD, but we still bother to specify it.
Maybe we should update RFC 2119 to state:

Obey: "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT"
Ignore: "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", "OPTIONAL"

-----Original Message-----
From: Martin Thomson [mailto:martin.thomson@gmail.com] 
Sent: Friday, September 06, 2013 4:38 PM
To: Mo Zanaty (mzanaty)
Cc: Jean-Marc Valin; Bo Burman; rtcweb@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtcweb-audio-02.txt

On 6 September 2013 13:28, Mo Zanaty (mzanaty) <mzanaty@cisco.com> wrote:
> If the will is hostile to other codecs, this text won't matter.

The natural disposition of the implementer is hostility toward more
work, so I don't see the text making much difference either way.