Re: [rtcweb] I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtcweb-audio-02.txt

Clearly no consensus for any more specific codecs. But the proposed text just says if you have more codecs available (not specific ones), you should offer them all, rather than suppress them and only offer the required codecs. So if the "will of the implementer" (current text) is neutral, this may sway them to offer more than required. If the will is hostile to other codecs, this text won't matter.

Mo

-----Original Message-----
From: rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Jean-Marc Valin
Sent: Friday, September 06, 2013 2:50 PM
To: Bo Burman
Cc: rtcweb@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtcweb-audio-02.txt

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

There was a consensus call made a while ago and as far as I remember,
there was no WG consensus for any SHOULD/RECOMMENDED codecs.

Cheers,

	Jean-Marc

On 08/27/2013 10:53 AM, Bo Burman wrote:
> Based on the previous discussion thread 
> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/current/msg08501.html,
> I believe there is support to add some text into this document.
> 
> I thus propose to add the following text at the end of section 3:
> 
> If other suitable audio codecs are available to the browser to use,
>  it is RECOMMENDED that they are also included in the offer in
> order to maximize the possibility to establish the session without
> the need for audio transcoding
> 
> Cheers, Bo
> 
>> -----Original Message----- From: i-d-announce-bounces@ietf.org 
>> [mailto:i-d-announce-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of 
>> internet-drafts@ietf.org Sent: den 2 augusti 2013 18:30 To: 
>> i-d-announce@ietf.org Cc: rtcweb@ietf.org Subject: I-D Action: 
>> draft-ietf-rtcweb-audio-02.txt
>> 
>> 
>> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line
>> Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the
>> Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers Working Group of the
>> IETF.
>> 
>> Title           : WebRTC Audio Codec and Processing Requirements
>>  Author(s)       : Jean-Marc Valin Cary Bran Filename        : 
>> draft-ietf-rtcweb-audio-02.txt Pages           : 6 Date :
>> 2013-08-02
>> 
>> Abstract: This document outlines the audio codec and processing 
>> requirements for WebRTC client application and endpoint devices.
>> 
>> 
>> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: 
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rtcweb-audio
>> 
>> There's also a htmlized version available at: 
>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-rtcweb-audio-02
>> 
>> A diff from the previous version is available at: 
>> http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-rtcweb-audio-02
>> 
>> 
>> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time
>> of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available
>> at tools.ietf.org.
>> 
>> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: 
>> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
>> 
>> _______________________________________________ I-D-Announce 
>> mailing list I-D-Announce@ietf.org 
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i-d-announce
>> Internet-Draft directories: http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html or 
>> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf/1shadow-sites.txt
> _______________________________________________ rtcweb mailing list
>  rtcweb@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
> 

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.13 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJSKiPAAAoJEJ6/8sItn9q9908H/iMwmIJWroZn/rWH8ndqg/am
e6yrEl9ZkcRGXXmhqZB4rhDGtUSFasqKyEi/l9SqD1/CR7CazwA0wFDKIVXrsilM
0iG/AlfmBtLHAC3sF2cIvd08q1oYcQgMowyDxUDGJo4ZnsKkQooMjjOuDFg9yYer
WT3WXpgNi3G1XrYWZ+03gwDUY44LmSrNdYfSca0Ys+/QOL4oLROKubAbv6Frou+T
FrL3y32701wQceWKXKzLXBIisHC4exF00+8v88BYQKEIwxXpfJvJx/HNdE3z/GIC
vVakzxB0p11+suwL3NHnM19S1yYnQLDBadivpT1tWpZ8O2Uh0xHECqXd54i5czc=
=bNwR
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
rtcweb mailing list
rtcweb@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb