Re: [rtcweb] I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtcweb-audio-02.txt
Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no> Thu, 05 September 2013 14:17 UTC
Return-Path: <harald@alvestrand.no>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 972D311E81A4 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Sep 2013 07:17:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.539
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.539 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.059, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nds9XVPwZCZt for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Sep 2013 07:17:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from eikenes.alvestrand.no (eikenes.alvestrand.no [158.38.152.233]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BB1621F9D8B for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 5 Sep 2013 07:17:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by eikenes.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id E927939E194 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 5 Sep 2013 16:17:47 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at eikenes.alvestrand.no
Received: from eikenes.alvestrand.no ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (eikenes.alvestrand.no [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id H-4pj9Ogx+K4 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 5 Sep 2013 16:17:46 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from hta-hippo.lul.corp.google.com (unknown [IPv6:2620:0:1043:1:7646:a0ff:fe90:e2bb]) by eikenes.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 083F739E128 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 5 Sep 2013 16:17:45 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <52289289.7040608@alvestrand.no>
Date: Thu, 05 Sep 2013 16:17:45 +0200
From: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130804 Thunderbird/17.0.8
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: rtcweb@ietf.org
References: <20130802162957.17108.79281.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <BBE9739C2C302046BD34B42713A1E2A22DF83C31@ESESSMB105.ericsson.se> <3879D71E758A7E4AA99A35DD8D41D3D91D5260A2@xmb-rcd-x14.cisco.com> <56C2F665D49E0341B9DF5938005ACDF80E8A65@DEMUMBX005.nsn-intra.net> <BBE9739C2C302046BD34B42713A1E2A22DF88232@ESESSMB105.ericsson.se> <CAGgHUiSK-bZrdXtxf-An8NM+pw-iqoWCrsG_bRUpxcD2DOCQrQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAGgHUiSK-bZrdXtxf-An8NM+pw-iqoWCrsG_bRUpxcD2DOCQrQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------040106030501040602060902"
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtcweb-audio-02.txt
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Sep 2013 14:17:55 -0000
On 09/05/2013 04:06 PM, Leon Geyser wrote: > It would be nice if a word like mandated/mandatory is present in the > new text like it was in the old text. Maybe REQUIRED in uppercase? REQUIRED is an RFC 2119 reserved word, and means the same thing as MUST. I would strenously object to REQUIRED. RECOMMENDED is also an RFC 2119 reserved word, and means the same thing as SHOULD. I have misgivings about giving such a strongly worded recommendation, but I can live with it. > > > On 5 September 2013 15:05, Bo Burman <bo.burman@ericsson.com > <mailto:bo.burman@ericsson.com>> wrote: > > I also support it. > /Bo > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Rauschenbach, Uwe (NSN - DE/Munich) > [mailto:uwe.rauschenbach@nsn.com <mailto:uwe.rauschenbach@nsn.com>] > > Sent: den 5 september 2013 12:14 > > To: ext Mo Zanaty (mzanaty); Bo Burman; rtcweb@ietf.org > <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org> > > Subject: RE: I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtcweb-audio-02.txt > > > > I support this proposal. > > > > Kind regards, > > Uwe > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org <mailto:rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org> > [mailto:rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org <mailto:rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org>] On > > > Behalf Of ext Mo Zanaty (mzanaty) > > > Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2013 10:03 PM > > > To: Bo Burman; rtcweb@ietf.org <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org> > > > Subject: Re: [rtcweb] I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtcweb-audio-02.txt > > > > > > I support the proposed text addition. But rather than adding > at the > > > end of section 3, replace the beginning of section 3 as below. > > > > > > OLD: > > > To ensure a baseline level of interoperability between WebRTC > > > clients, a minimum set of required codecs are specified below. > > > While this section specifies the codecs that will be > mandated for > > > all > > > WebRTC client implementations, it leaves the question of > supporting > > > additional codecs to the will of the implementer. > > > > > > NEW: > > > To ensure a baseline level of interoperability between WebRTC > > > clients, a minimum set of required codecs are specified below. > > > If other suitable audio codecs are available to the browser > to use, > > > it is RECOMMENDED that they are also included in the offer > in order > > > to maximize the possibility to establish the session > without the > > > need > > > for audio transcoding. > > > > > > Mo > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org <mailto:rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org> > [mailto:rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org <mailto:rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org>] On > > > Behalf Of Bo Burman > > > Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2013 10:53 AM > > > To: rtcweb@ietf.org <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org> > > > Subject: Re: [rtcweb] I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtcweb-audio-02.txt > > > > > > Based on the previous discussion thread http://www.ietf.org/mail- > > > archive/web/rtcweb/current/msg08501.html, I believe there is > support > > > to add some text into this document. > > > > > > I thus propose to add the following text at the end of section 3: > > > > > > If other suitable audio codecs are available to the browser to > use, it > > > is RECOMMENDED that they are also included in the offer in > order to > > > maximize the possibility to establish the session without the > need for > > > audio transcoding > > > > > > Cheers, > > > Bo > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: i-d-announce-bounces@ietf.org > <mailto:i-d-announce-bounces@ietf.org> [mailto:i-d-announce- > <mailto:i-d-announce-> > > > bounces@ietf.org <mailto:bounces@ietf.org>] On Behalf Of > internet-drafts@ietf.org <mailto:internet-drafts@ietf.org> > > > > Sent: den 2 augusti 2013 18:30 > > > > To: i-d-announce@ietf.org <mailto:i-d-announce@ietf.org> > > > > Cc: rtcweb@ietf.org <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org> > > > > Subject: I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtcweb-audio-02.txt > > > > > > > > > > > > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line > Internet-Drafts > > > directories. > > > > This draft is a work item of the Real-Time Communication in > WEB- > > > browsers Working Group of the IETF. > > > > > > > > Title : WebRTC Audio Codec and Processing > Requirements > > > > Author(s) : Jean-Marc Valin > > > > Cary Bran > > > > Filename : draft-ietf-rtcweb-audio-02.txt > > > > Pages : 6 > > > > Date : 2013-08-02 > > > > > > > > Abstract: > > > > This document outlines the audio codec and processing > requirements > > > > for WebRTC client application and endpoint devices. > > > > > > > > > > > > The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: > > > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rtcweb-audio > > > > > > > > There's also a htmlized version available at: > > > > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-rtcweb-audio-02 > > > > > > > > A diff from the previous version is available at: > > > > http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-rtcweb-audio-02 > > > > > > > > > > > > Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the > time of > > > submission until the htmlized version and diff are > > > > available at tools.ietf.org <http://tools.ietf.org>. > > > > > > > > Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: > > > > ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > I-D-Announce mailing list > > > > I-D-Announce@ietf.org <mailto:I-D-Announce@ietf.org> > > > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i-d-announce > > > > Internet-Draft directories: http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html or > > > ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf/1shadow-sites.txt > > > _______________________________________________ > > > rtcweb mailing list > > > rtcweb@ietf.org <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org> > > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb > > > _______________________________________________ > > > rtcweb mailing list > > > rtcweb@ietf.org <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org> > > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb > _______________________________________________ > rtcweb mailing list > rtcweb@ietf.org <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb > > > > > _______________________________________________ > rtcweb mailing list > rtcweb@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
- [rtcweb] I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtcweb-audio-02.t… internet-drafts
- Re: [rtcweb] I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtcweb-audio-… Bo Burman
- Re: [rtcweb] I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtcweb-audio-… Mo Zanaty (mzanaty)
- Re: [rtcweb] I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtcweb-audio-… Rauschenbach, Uwe (NSN - DE/Munich)
- Re: [rtcweb] I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtcweb-audio-… Bo Burman
- Re: [rtcweb] I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtcweb-audio-… Leon Geyser
- Re: [rtcweb] I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtcweb-audio-… Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [rtcweb] I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtcweb-audio-… Mo Zanaty (mzanaty)
- Re: [rtcweb] I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtcweb-audio-… Lijing (Jessie, Huawei)
- Re: [rtcweb] I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtcweb-audio-… Hutton, Andrew
- Re: [rtcweb] I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtcweb-audio-… Jean-Marc Valin
- Re: [rtcweb] I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtcweb-audio-… Mo Zanaty (mzanaty)
- Re: [rtcweb] I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtcweb-audio-… Martin Thomson
- Re: [rtcweb] I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtcweb-audio-… Mo Zanaty (mzanaty)
- Re: [rtcweb] I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtcweb-audio-… Martin Thomson
- Re: [rtcweb] I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtcweb-audio-… Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [rtcweb] I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtcweb-audio-… Martin Thomson
- Re: [rtcweb] I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtcweb-audio-… stephane.proust
- Re: [rtcweb] I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtcweb-audio-… Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [rtcweb] I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtcweb-audio-… Eric Rescorla
- Re: [rtcweb] I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtcweb-audio-… Matt Fredrickson
- Re: [rtcweb] I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtcweb-audio-… Matt Fredrickson
- Re: [rtcweb] I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtcweb-audio-… Jean-Marc Valin
- Re: [rtcweb] I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtcweb-audio-… Roman Shpount
- Re: [rtcweb] I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtcweb-audio-… stephane.proust
- Re: [rtcweb] I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtcweb-audio-… Tim Panton
- Re: [rtcweb] I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtcweb-audio-… Bernard Aboba
- Re: [rtcweb] I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtcweb-audio-… Roman Shpount