IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] New Draft - WebRTC JS Object API Model

Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net> Tue, 02 July 2013 08:02 UTC

Return-Path: <ibc@aliax.net>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C7BE11E8404 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Jul 2013 01:02:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.644
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.644 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.033, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id V21U3Sm2AapY for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Jul 2013 01:02:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qa0-f48.google.com (mail-qa0-f48.google.com [209.85.216.48]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4847711E83D5 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 2 Jul 2013 01:02:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qa0-f48.google.com with SMTP id cm16so2644983qab.0 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 02 Jul 2013 01:02:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-gm-message-state; bh=QFXm6TSc6NwsBkurC5ApY0tusbJST5eBdt1AdcJ8x7g=; b=L+af60npFK88fZYkobYeNHWXoI7cRJHddxOXlgG2BZbxeIyHvRWDnlCpAzwVs1I3lF ZRUVQJfgRN6cKJl2XyqT+jCOF4Uwu6iQtkS/0ZYgiAewGyXsjVHaDJ5jru+JRTPJM/i0 z98GbA5gi8BJN5ta36e/9NdOItWdMYf1VKgSwaRpi4wbzSkjc/gPZMIdsKjXGT8wOicN P62UqY92K0qY02J/BCFCqdGmJlrsCWwwHsjyuXDGZ3c0YgkkT3Kdzi3xsECS0fjt/OFf efwlg2erCtkHPlCuc90Gnmtvk4wch241SPzpDIQNSsu7RKnJY0TreUKh5dbSxPb6pFOv ogsg==
X-Received: by 10.224.182.79 with SMTP id cb15mr37880464qab.48.1372752125762; Tue, 02 Jul 2013 01:02:05 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.49.72.132 with HTTP; Tue, 2 Jul 2013 01:01:45 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <1447FA0C20ED5147A1AA0EF02890A64B1C3098BA@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se>
References: <51CA6FEE.6030702@hookflash.com> <1447FA0C20ED5147A1AA0EF02890A64B1C3093E0@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <CALiegfmsahUM6w00thQSCu3CpKse2C3LKSb1LzkwodNgKTOK0g@mail.gmail.com> <1447FA0C20ED5147A1AA0EF02890A64B1C309655@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <CALiegfnAN9SJx0nLyegFJoQscG-18Gs4umd-pe7S3y6xREpByQ@mail.gmail.com> <CA+9kkMC5FoxKSz7DuHxN8cEO=0PDpoAGrLshpFmnDe3gco06cw@mail.gmail.com> <CALiegfnpj+nBdhn0g8A7iTdXKZdqvwyffjdLAOuM_qQkhTuKew@mail.gmail.com> <CA+9kkMA1PhoJB9qGUnXDUHRJNac5OszM4o5O7-6aCU-ahszMNw@mail.gmail.com> <CALiegfkei-dS-EHt2vqofft_uhKNz+UuK7R5LX3bgDkh=0ZwqQ@mail.gmail.com> <1447FA0C20ED5147A1AA0EF02890A64B1C30979C@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <CAD5OKxs3Zb2CMHsAGUA2hcdDA7tWxUCmH6RbnRt7MGU+JCknqw@mail.gmail.com> <1447FA0C20ED5147A1AA0EF02890A64B1C3098BA@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se>
From: Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net>
Date: Tue, 02 Jul 2013 10:01:45 +0200
Message-ID: <CALiegfnk4LOEZZ_n9hDi4jx_66m=gdSYT54-d+L4UDT4U-B9ng@mail.gmail.com>
To: Stefan Håkansson LK <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQn0TDHmeTjuNfxJbLTCrcLAaeq2ELmm57GNH2EAxNELRoU6dDsu1MrsMcO702u+zCY6tmxR
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] New Draft - WebRTC JS Object API Model
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Jul 2013 08:02:11 -0000

2013/7/2 Stefan Håkansson LK <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com>:
> But I think we should not underestimate the work needed to describe all
> the nitty gritty details using another "language" than SDP.

Hi Stefan,

As said multiple times we are not proposing a replacement for SDP.
Passing an opaque blob string between browser and WebRTC is not the
only solution, even more, I don't consider that an "API".

If after reading the draft you have understood that we are proposing a
replacement for SDP then we've done something wrong.

Regards.

--
Iñaki Baz Castillo
<ibc@aliax.net>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email