Re: [rtcweb] Basic scenario 'impossible?' to achieve with the actual API

Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Tue, 02 July 2013 18:06 UTC

Return-Path: <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C6F321F9B0F for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Jul 2013 11:06:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.5
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.100, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kN0xefHt2qAe for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Jul 2013 11:06:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wg0-x231.google.com (mail-wg0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::231]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D8C421F9BD5 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 2 Jul 2013 11:06:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wg0-f49.google.com with SMTP id a12so4925150wgh.4 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 02 Jul 2013 11:06:41 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=wq7By0XpTAExW1c70rTwMKJhForpPIoPtw7iTMbD1wM=; b=jqZd3kFRkgrDm5Kmf14Ce6nPT+XSj7CudYMJTIfZ5vxw19vN3hon5ppFAX40oTejV7 IaCbKq8SD0H+Z4VIgviDgB/gWPvBDZqDKfe8d77HIE6kwqjYTDNag9cfjlUk6QmBWCBS suVm6fDY/t/jNnW76w+SjTdPdHm+F3VNyiVUPpXjQLIAZOB1wq/Jbx8hAqRr5D+gJuL5 /U21yhnHAfWHABPhjjCNfHROHIse6Q1CS2dGzkTGVxNVNCQ2MnP7F//7sbX0+LIEFPfM Kx8xw65miZkgPScjrCIby53FYwrMKBymhMFPMy54Wvsc0fmxGXxLtA0VV14so/17uOw3 vXFA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.194.110.6 with SMTP id hw6mr24769281wjb.3.1372788401525; Tue, 02 Jul 2013 11:06:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.194.60.46 with HTTP; Tue, 2 Jul 2013 11:06:41 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <57A15FAF9E58F841B2B1651FFE16D2810539DF@GENSJZMBX01.msg.int.genesyslab.com>
References: <CABw3bnOp1jY6-ziR-PFG4-fRTT5zQ5ebQkmp5PhzeS1ew=h98g@mail.gmail.com> <51D2FC3C.8090609@telecomitalia.it> <CALiegfkrbw7ouiEP726LMOkGJb3bmicU03svZ-3VMLH3Oxhtjw@mail.gmail.com> <57A15FAF9E58F841B2B1651FFE16D2810539DF@GENSJZMBX01.msg.int.genesyslab.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2013 11:06:41 -0700
Message-ID: <CABkgnnUR0K2iOnbXYYvb8DPgsQ0s-L7hd-zL+DcQ1PJo0vbdiA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
To: Jim Barnett <Jim.Barnett@genesyslab.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Basic scenario 'impossible?' to achieve with the actual API
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Jul 2013 18:06:43 -0000

On 2 July 2013 10:20, Jim Barnett <Jim.Barnett@genesyslab.com> wrote:
> When the JS calls setRemote with the response (which rejects the video), the UA will know that the video has been rejected.  Is the idea that the UA will let the user know via the chrome?  Do we think it is the JS applications job to notify the user of success/failure, or the UA's?  I don't recall a discussion of this.

Notifications in Chrome aren't sufficient.  The application needs to know too.