Re: [rtcweb] Plan A, respun - bundle-only attribute
worley@ariadne.com (Dale R. Worley) Thu, 09 May 2013 15:13 UTC
Return-Path: <worley@shell01.TheWorld.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A62D21F90BB for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 May 2013 08:13:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.602
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.602 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.378, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB=0.619]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7RwEYpLkrXbb for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 May 2013 08:13:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from TheWorld.com (pcls6.std.com [192.74.137.146]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5972C21F8FDD for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 9 May 2013 08:13:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from shell.TheWorld.com (svani@shell01.theworld.com [192.74.137.71]) by TheWorld.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r49FCRtr028446; Thu, 9 May 2013 11:12:29 -0400
Received: from shell01.TheWorld.com (localhost.theworld.com [127.0.0.1]) by shell.TheWorld.com (8.13.6/8.12.8) with ESMTP id r49FCQBY4426003; Thu, 9 May 2013 11:12:26 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from worley@localhost) by shell01.TheWorld.com (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id r49FCQZh4436322; Thu, 9 May 2013 11:12:26 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Thu, 09 May 2013 11:12:26 -0400
Message-Id: <201305091512.r49FCQZh4436322@shell01.TheWorld.com>
From: worley@ariadne.com
Sender: worley@ariadne.com
To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
In-reply-to: <CABkgnnXkTvmrnS_8cn8ryQkupKoS=PL1JmWsYnJFUs_PE4MKKQ@mail.gmail.com> (martin.thomson@gmail.com)
References: <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1C36CCC8@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1C36CDD2@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <51896824.2000705@nostrum.com> <201305081937.r48JbQsp4388201@shell01.TheWorld.com> <CABkgnnXkTvmrnS_8cn8ryQkupKoS=PL1JmWsYnJFUs_PE4MKKQ@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: rtcweb@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Plan A, respun - bundle-only attribute
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 May 2013 15:13:14 -0000
> From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> > > On 8 May 2013 12:37, Dale R. Worley <worley@ariadne.com> wrote: > > This is a promising proposal, but I think a lot more care needs to be > > taken in defining how port numbers are to be used in this technique. > > I can't tell what particular uses of port numbers are allowed and what > > ones are not allowed. And it seems that the intended patterns could > > result in problematic behaviors from intermediate devices. > > Thankfully, that's a problem that bundle is going to solve, not this > document. The only statements that this draft needs to make is with > respect to zero vs. non-zero port numbers, and only in the context of > a=bundle-only. OK, I hadn't grasped the degree to which draft-roach-rtcweb-plan-a is intended to be just an amendment to draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-bundle-negotiation. But it still does introduce new patterns of use of port numbers in m= lines (e.g., an answer can have a non-zero port number for an m= line which had a zero port number in the offer), so we can't just wave our hands and say "draft-bundle-negotiation will solve that" -- it's a substantial change to what bundle-negotiation is proposing and solving the problems that are apparent in bundle-negotiation won't solve all the problems that result if draft-roach-rtcweb-plan-a is added to it. Dale
- Re: [rtcweb] Plan A, respun - bundle-only attribu… Christer Holmberg
- Re: [rtcweb] Plan A, respun - bundle-only attribu… Christer Holmberg
- Re: [rtcweb] Plan A, respun - bundle-only attribu… Adam Roach
- Re: [rtcweb] Plan A, respun - bundle-only attribu… Christer Holmberg
- Re: [rtcweb] Plan A, respun - bundle-only attribu… Dale R. Worley
- Re: [rtcweb] Plan A, respun - bundle-only attribu… Martin Thomson
- Re: [rtcweb] Plan A, respun - bundle-only attribu… Cullen Jennings
- Re: [rtcweb] Plan A, respun - bundle-only attribu… Cullen Jennings
- Re: [rtcweb] Plan A, respun - bundle-only attribu… Dale R. Worley
- Re: [rtcweb] Plan A, respun - bundle-only attribu… Martin Thomson
- Re: [rtcweb] Plan A, respun - bundle-only attribu… Dale R. Worley
- Re: [rtcweb] Plan A, respun - bundle-only attribu… Cullen Jennings