Re: [rtcweb] [MMUSIC] Is bundle just a port override?

"Cullen Jennings (fluffy)" <fluffy@cisco.com> Thu, 09 May 2013 15:56 UTC

Return-Path: <fluffy@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92BBD21F941D; Thu, 9 May 2013 08:56:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.249
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.249 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.350, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id N0I2pczsw4XX; Thu, 9 May 2013 08:56:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com [173.37.86.75]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D857821F8FB6; Thu, 9 May 2013 08:56:17 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=457; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1368114978; x=1369324578; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=sH+Ra7Www1YXksbNBBmytqz/ao9hiDn7iPUCdnqxmr0=; b=Ai2/xqiL9gBTZ+LtYwONb9Qw50huDrBi2bKQKDjFJNBPiHsQjmmo3EnJ U3eOkjFihGWMCWgCtbQT2YcNhcFK+Xtfal3wqC329Swmbn2X2pDOJRGdA G0xwiw7LI0TPHhF7u/mgBS56KbyKqHiNwjmfKQT2pgigamCgg2f4K5pmv c=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AlsFAN/Fi1GtJXG+/2dsb2JhbABSgweDLL0SehZ0gh8BAQEDATo/EAIBCBUNFBAyJQIEDgUIh34FAb4JjnUCMQeCdGEDqGGDD4In
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.87,641,1363132800"; d="scan'208";a="208483206"
Received: from rcdn-core2-3.cisco.com ([173.37.113.190]) by rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP; 09 May 2013 15:56:05 +0000
Received: from xhc-rcd-x11.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x11.cisco.com [173.37.183.85]) by rcdn-core2-3.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r49Fu5d9010339 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Thu, 9 May 2013 15:56:05 GMT
Received: from xmb-aln-x02.cisco.com ([169.254.5.192]) by xhc-rcd-x11.cisco.com ([173.37.183.85]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.004; Thu, 9 May 2013 10:56:05 -0500
From: "Cullen Jennings (fluffy)" <fluffy@cisco.com>
To: "Dale R. Worley" <worley@ariadne.com>
Thread-Topic: [MMUSIC] [rtcweb] Is bundle just a port override?
Thread-Index: AQHOTM21I5ApWExVKkWVb2vtaIzXwA==
Date: Thu, 9 May 2013 15:56:04 +0000
Message-ID: <C5E08FE080ACFD4DAE31E4BDBF944EB1134DC736@xmb-aln-x02.cisco.com>
References: <3879D71E758A7E4AA99A35DD8D41D3D90F6942C3@xmb-rcd-x14.cisco.com> <514829CE.4010004@alvestrand.no> <3879D71E758A7E4AA99A35DD8D41D3D90F694591@xmb-rcd-x14.cisco.com> <51489A43.3030109@jitsi.org> <3879D71E758A7E4AA99A35DD8D41D3D90F69476F@xmb-rcd-x14.cisco.com> <201303191936.r2JJakU4763611@shell01.TheWorld.com> <3879D71E758A7E4AA99A35DD8D41D3D90F6951B8@xmb-rcd-x14.cisco.com> <CAOJ7v-2eH9oy8=OWVyoUki5ALWSwaB8x_dwpYUDJ-rY_VJ--kw@mail.gmail.com> <3879D71E758A7E4AA99A35DD8D41D3D90F695235@xmb-rcd-x14.cisco.com> <201303221928.r2MJSOvW960763@shell01.TheWorld.com>
In-Reply-To: <201303221928.r2MJSOvW960763@shell01.TheWorld.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [171.68.20.68]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <A067025962870A4984D3B982D6B982DF@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>, "mmusic@ietf.org" <mmusic@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] [MMUSIC] Is bundle just a port override?
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 May 2013 15:56:25 -0000

On Mar 22, 2013, at 12:28 PM, Dale R. Worley <worley@ariadne.com> wrote:

>> From: "Mo Zanaty (mzanaty)" <mzanaty@cisco.com>
>> 
>> BTW, has anyone actually observed failures?
> 
> My memory is that Cullen Jennings knows of a significant installed
> base of SBCs that choke on SDP that contains duplicated port
> references.
> 
> Dale

Some of them are using the port as the think to uniquely key into the active data structures.