Re: [rtcweb] ice-lite in WebRTC ???
Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no> Fri, 07 February 2014 18:04 UTC
Return-Path: <harald@alvestrand.no>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D9F81AC7F2 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Feb 2014 10:04:11 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.135
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.135 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MANGLED_NOTICE=2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.535] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lWUaEKBLdXag for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Feb 2014 10:04:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mork.alvestrand.no (mork.alvestrand.no [158.38.152.117]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7F671A03E1 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Fri, 7 Feb 2014 10:04:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mork.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 446DA7C4B20; Fri, 7 Feb 2014 19:04:09 +0100 (CET)
Received: from mork.alvestrand.no ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mork.alvestrand.no [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Uy08W86Tv45i; Fri, 7 Feb 2014 19:04:09 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [172.19.7.58] (unknown [216.239.45.90]) by mork.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 812047C4B1F; Fri, 7 Feb 2014 19:04:08 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <52F52016.2060703@alvestrand.no>
Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2014 19:04:06 +0100
From: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Parthasarathi R <partha@parthasarathi.co.in>, rtcweb@ietf.org
References: <CANCLmwniOd1MmdubfhARB0iCZTK1BYW46fwpDvus=UvOE2ynZg@mail.gmail.com> <CALe60zDC8Y_CspF3rkvqqcbP0_yWVviiFqq31R9gjq+GOW=7Xw@mail.gmail.com> <3A5DAAA1FDD9764EAA3B2A633A91A0495F8B49D5@xmb-aln-x15.cisco.com> <52F43DF3.1020401@alvestrand.no> <007401cf2421$58729a20$0957ce60$@co.in>
In-Reply-To: <007401cf2421$58729a20$0957ce60$@co.in>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] ice-lite in WebRTC ???
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2014 18:04:11 -0000
On 02/07/2014 05:26 PM, Parthasarathi R wrote: > <snip> > The server doesn't have to claim WebRTC conformance, it just has to >> claim to interoperate with WebRTC endpoints. </snip> > The above assumption leads to lot of confusion in WebRTC Server implementation which starts from RTCWeb requirement itself. IMO, it is better to provide the minimum IETF standard guidelines for WebRTC servers like ice-lite/ICE, BUNDLE required or not, ICE-TCP/TURN. It seems to me like a good document to write, but should probably be done after we finish the requirements for WebRTC endpoints. Unless someone wishes to start one, of course.
- Re: [rtcweb] ice-lite in WebRTC ??? Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [rtcweb] ice-lite in WebRTC ??? Justin Uberti
- Re: [rtcweb] ice-lite in WebRTC ??? Wilson Chen (weichen2)
- Re: [rtcweb] ice-lite in WebRTC ??? Parthasarathi R
- Re: [rtcweb] ice-lite in WebRTC ??? Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [rtcweb] ice-lite in WebRTC ??? Parthasarathi R
- Re: [rtcweb] ice-lite in WebRTC ??? Sergio Garcia Murillo