IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] ice-lite in WebRTC ???

Sergio Garcia Murillo <sergio.garcia.murillo@gmail.com> Sat, 08 February 2014 11:23 UTC

Return-Path: <sergio.garcia.murillo@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D6571A05EF for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 8 Feb 2014 03:23:39 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.3
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.3 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, MANGLED_NOTICE=2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kRpq4Lp_82F3 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 8 Feb 2014 03:23:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-we0-x233.google.com (mail-we0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::233]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0BCE1A020B for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Sat, 8 Feb 2014 03:23:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-we0-f179.google.com with SMTP id q58so2968897wes.38 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Sat, 08 Feb 2014 03:23:36 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=AyH3T6urXBbT9jy5g62Mpqo4IPqDAPz4/5CMvTYv8I0=; b=R/UJ1WFQp7Gc1h5sqdPq7zRjnpm302jor1wEm3IdnkCpAu+S2cxB06HNBDJUpDGsrA 0i6ZrbKyp04WgOocWLKmPNp3d62Y1JneDs+rbYNEWEd2k6HBu3d3qtkZ63wiE4uzVqAy 1az/kptGKPcKcxcYFV9DIWsV4MBroa0I8CxaPBnoAaW8bh985e4bZpKqGI7fxeaXsdSx XCpsOFfVQ+4uJ+C6A66KZtrm08BWIrhHQPU/G85sFH6fiTfsz2FomPJ4aWIm2DXMs5W+ KYQIzJyk1lNAPK/WiIxBupZM965bKId2ckbq11Ufkd4EYU4UCam79+ohegPpARN3lBnq iOIA==
X-Received: by 10.194.142.170 with SMTP id rx10mr14382043wjb.13.1391858616714; Sat, 08 Feb 2014 03:23:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.0.192] ([95.61.111.78]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id q2sm17979507wjq.0.2014.02.08.03.23.34 for <rtcweb@ietf.org> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sat, 08 Feb 2014 03:23:35 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <52F613BC.1050204@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 08 Feb 2014 12:23:40 +0100
From: Sergio Garcia Murillo <sergio.garcia.murillo@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: rtcweb@ietf.org
References: <CANCLmwniOd1MmdubfhARB0iCZTK1BYW46fwpDvus=UvOE2ynZg@mail.gmail.com> <CALe60zDC8Y_CspF3rkvqqcbP0_yWVviiFqq31R9gjq+GOW=7Xw@mail.gmail.com> <3A5DAAA1FDD9764EAA3B2A633A91A0495F8B49D5@xmb-aln-x15.cisco.com> <52F43DF3.1020401@alvestrand.no> <007401cf2421$58729a20$0957ce60$@co.in> <52F52016.2060703@alvestrand.no> <004801cf24b5$86777550$93665ff0$@co.in>
In-Reply-To: <004801cf24b5$86777550$93665ff0$@co.in>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] ice-lite in WebRTC ???
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Feb 2014 11:23:39 -0000

Hi Partha,

I have quite some real life experience on webrtc server side 
implementation, so count on me.

Best regards
Sergio

El 08/02/2014 11:07, Parthasarathi R escribió:
> Hi Harald & all,
>
> I agree with Harald that WebRTC Endpoints requirements has to be frozen before starting WebRTC Server/Gateway guidelines documents. I guess that draft-ietf-rtcweb-use-cases-and-requirements document open items will be closed during IETF-89 based on the current open items.
>
> I'll write the strawman proposal after IETF-89 to start the discussion. I'm interested in hearing anybody else interested in contributing for the same.
>
> Thanks
> Partha
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Harald Alvestrand [mailto:harald@alvestrand.no]
>> Sent: Friday, February 07, 2014 11:34 PM
>> To: Parthasarathi R; rtcweb@ietf.org
>> Subject: Re: [rtcweb] ice-lite in WebRTC ???
>>
>> On 02/07/2014 05:26 PM, Parthasarathi R wrote:
>>> <snip> > The server doesn't have to claim WebRTC conformance, it just
>> has to
>>>> claim to interoperate with WebRTC endpoints. </snip>
>>> The above assumption leads to lot of confusion in WebRTC Server
>> implementation which starts from RTCWeb requirement itself. IMO, it is
>> better to provide the minimum IETF standard guidelines for WebRTC
>> servers like ice-lite/ICE, BUNDLE required or not, ICE-TCP/TURN.
>>
>> It seems to me like a good document to write, but should probably be
>> done after we finish the requirements for WebRTC endpoints.
>>
>> Unless someone wishes to start one, of course.
> _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> rtcweb@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email