Re: [rtcweb] ice-lite in WebRTC ???
"Parthasarathi R" <partha@parthasarathi.co.in> Sat, 08 February 2014 10:07 UTC
Return-Path: <partha@parthasarathi.co.in>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E6D51A05E0 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 8 Feb 2014 02:07:15 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 3.333
X-Spam-Level: ***
X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.333 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, MANGLED_NOTICE=2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4HX-4bHzeDaw for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 8 Feb 2014 02:07:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp.mailhostbox.com (outbound-us2.mailhostbox.com [69.93.141.235]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11ACB1A0456 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Sat, 8 Feb 2014 02:07:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from userPC (unknown [122.167.125.187]) (Authenticated sender: partha@parthasarathi.co.in) by smtp.mailhostbox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id F2AF06392B5; Sat, 8 Feb 2014 10:07:10 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=parthasarathi.co.in; s=20120823; t=1391854033; bh=h5YCfGT8QXUYD4O4+i2jhYEvQBL6gCK/0o0ku2YDRa0=; h=From:To:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=hGVSB67MT3ba9kdwijqrAt0ad9XuedZ5uyCbYP3OAMd7V0cwgmMnVNnaWuxWdSoEL SWyvFlD63wKR5js25HAM7yeicwQIkjNKFxMEh0GSb+3vTJjt6lKgXNglvFvzrRD6lL WMtESK09LSQDU/338uSJXwNVyS+HzNXHquzTWPnM=
From: Parthasarathi R <partha@parthasarathi.co.in>
To: 'Harald Alvestrand' <harald@alvestrand.no>, rtcweb@ietf.org
References: <CANCLmwniOd1MmdubfhARB0iCZTK1BYW46fwpDvus=UvOE2ynZg@mail.gmail.com> <CALe60zDC8Y_CspF3rkvqqcbP0_yWVviiFqq31R9gjq+GOW=7Xw@mail.gmail.com> <3A5DAAA1FDD9764EAA3B2A633A91A0495F8B49D5@xmb-aln-x15.cisco.com> <52F43DF3.1020401@alvestrand.no> <007401cf2421$58729a20$0957ce60$@co.in> <52F52016.2060703@alvestrand.no>
In-Reply-To: <52F52016.2060703@alvestrand.no>
Date: Sat, 08 Feb 2014 15:37:03 +0530
Message-ID: <004801cf24b5$86777550$93665ff0$@co.in>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0
Thread-Index: Ac8kLwVrFf1lRMkvQcmWxhxY0gRGdgAgmuJw
Content-Language: en-us
X-CTCH-RefID: str=0001.0A020201.52F601D1.0074, ss=1, re=0.000, recu=0.000, reip=0.000, cl=1, cld=1, fgs=0
X-CTCH-VOD: Unknown
X-CTCH-Spam: Unknown
X-CTCH-Score: 0.000
X-CTCH-Rules:
X-CTCH-Flags: 0
X-CTCH-ScoreCust: 0.000
X-CTCH-SenderID: partha@parthasarathi.co.in
X-CTCH-SenderID-TotalMessages: 1
X-CTCH-SenderID-TotalSpam: 0
X-CTCH-SenderID-TotalSuspected: 0
X-CTCH-SenderID-TotalBulk: 0
X-CTCH-SenderID-TotalConfirmed: 0
X-CTCH-SenderID-TotalRecipients: 0
X-CTCH-SenderID-TotalVirus: 0
X-CTCH-SenderID-BlueWhiteFlag: 0
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.72 on 70.87.28.142
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] ice-lite in WebRTC ???
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Feb 2014 10:07:15 -0000
Hi Harald & all, I agree with Harald that WebRTC Endpoints requirements has to be frozen before starting WebRTC Server/Gateway guidelines documents. I guess that draft-ietf-rtcweb-use-cases-and-requirements document open items will be closed during IETF-89 based on the current open items. I'll write the strawman proposal after IETF-89 to start the discussion. I'm interested in hearing anybody else interested in contributing for the same. Thanks Partha > -----Original Message----- > From: Harald Alvestrand [mailto:harald@alvestrand.no] > Sent: Friday, February 07, 2014 11:34 PM > To: Parthasarathi R; rtcweb@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [rtcweb] ice-lite in WebRTC ??? > > On 02/07/2014 05:26 PM, Parthasarathi R wrote: > > <snip> > The server doesn't have to claim WebRTC conformance, it just > has to > >> claim to interoperate with WebRTC endpoints. </snip> > > The above assumption leads to lot of confusion in WebRTC Server > implementation which starts from RTCWeb requirement itself. IMO, it is > better to provide the minimum IETF standard guidelines for WebRTC > servers like ice-lite/ICE, BUNDLE required or not, ICE-TCP/TURN. > > It seems to me like a good document to write, but should probably be > done after we finish the requirements for WebRTC endpoints. > > Unless someone wishes to start one, of course.
- Re: [rtcweb] ice-lite in WebRTC ??? Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [rtcweb] ice-lite in WebRTC ??? Justin Uberti
- Re: [rtcweb] ice-lite in WebRTC ??? Wilson Chen (weichen2)
- Re: [rtcweb] ice-lite in WebRTC ??? Parthasarathi R
- Re: [rtcweb] ice-lite in WebRTC ??? Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [rtcweb] ice-lite in WebRTC ??? Parthasarathi R
- Re: [rtcweb] ice-lite in WebRTC ??? Sergio Garcia Murillo