IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] Default candidate pool size

Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Mon, 19 May 2014 02:13 UTC

Return-Path: <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23AF81A0259 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 18 May 2014 19:13:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HPhqHiF-x958 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 18 May 2014 19:13:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-we0-x22a.google.com (mail-we0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::22a]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 860E51A0256 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Sun, 18 May 2014 19:13:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-we0-f170.google.com with SMTP id u57so4902090wes.29 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Sun, 18 May 2014 19:13:23 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=7aNTkOIL5MNHnj62ZB75/xqRRe2GyFUSAA9rOknmm40=; b=0LWXTiDBJZaPYx+pBLvTT03n44tTZiS14NK3kVO0JJW0YDA8xOdbAyVvbTcgYJ4OFJ lHkmfyk/olYdJmbNJ90ZgPnuMGipGEt3XJBFiTU9hJREkQQqWGOLiWEZa20sQJiSjriT /bLSAEWrB0HMWtL7XhhHyc+y0tg3XH4ZhsjXGPj20IqSlBjEHT5AmOvbKNAdMiOvSxKO KnerEsuEJGwPatU9OJlIG42UESPqMAFLEzMwB8nTPLqgEgkaPm7iCftJUOhdeGidjRhf 07KF7SD/JuSoTjbvJP0lAYQ4SfZ0GAX5N2DBZf4WLc95YEocGmfmTWWoM8zUMBNhVwfk +oXA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.77.165 with SMTP id t5mr10284132wiw.38.1400465602951; Sun, 18 May 2014 19:13:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.194.235.163 with HTTP; Sun, 18 May 2014 19:13:22 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAOJ7v-2wKU4AU07BJvhTs6ok8GknGkY2oAuwyOhsJvdwk3r4hQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CABcZeBNdd9Ze1G3ZOpGHVKsGKBdhEAOzg4qt7XKnX75dhQyTkA@mail.gmail.com> <CABkgnnVjJTnTypBqL-YLMPwo0_RSdkMLgQvD+L03jwyt_ffDqQ@mail.gmail.com> <FFCA477F-653D-46FF-93CE-4338EA856C5C@iii.ca> <CABcZeBMS5x-wW24PAOOCMG8nM2Ac1fvi_y2XOekmgAeQHL056A@mail.gmail.com> <8C8E3AB0-F3B6-4413-BD01-05D117FF598F@iii.ca> <CAOJ7v-3PwfOiLNtrguNru+L+Aun2Qw7giRx23dobu8eh5NDVDw@mail.gmail.com> <CABcZeBOpn4UzhwQrLEL7iMoNr7HuXhvkA3=W-nZBkfAUo5Z-iQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAOJ7v-0U9bbujV4_S3ekPDt0UiN=F=JAe4t1LSOP=Fb07TK5GQ@mail.gmail.com> <CABcZeBNdAKOCDmB0XDaUu4qWx=nMJomgm2tR7TYZ2A0wheFm2Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAOJ7v-2wKU4AU07BJvhTs6ok8GknGkY2oAuwyOhsJvdwk3r4hQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 18 May 2014 19:13:22 -0700
Message-ID: <CABkgnnURfHFMH-n66FeDLED5wL1=1yOggJpmtdFyq2YxYeyyog@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
To: Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/aHYFzYbk8-Yph6aLdqWHmgkgblU
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>, "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Default candidate pool size
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 May 2014 02:13:26 -0000

On 18 May 2014 10:54, Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com> wrote:
> IOW, we should ignore the candidate list supplied completely, unless we want
> to just ensure that we haven't been given garbage, in which case we can
> check for that and error out.

I think that's a fine idea; all options.  Pick one.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email