Re: [rtcweb] Default candidate pool size
Cullen Jennings <fluffy@iii.ca> Sun, 18 May 2014 16:53 UTC
Return-Path: <fluffy@iii.ca>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A25931A00D7 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 18 May 2014 09:53:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.701
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.701 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fG04HIImxN6F for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 18 May 2014 09:53:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mxout-07.mxes.net (mxout-07.mxes.net [216.86.168.182]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2AB621A007C for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Sun, 18 May 2014 09:53:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rtp-vpn3-1334.cisco.com (unknown [64.102.254.33]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0336222E253; Sun, 18 May 2014 12:53:25 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.2 \(1874\))
From: Cullen Jennings <fluffy@iii.ca>
In-Reply-To: <CABcZeBMS5x-wW24PAOOCMG8nM2Ac1fvi_y2XOekmgAeQHL056A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 18 May 2014 12:56:31 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <8C8E3AB0-F3B6-4413-BD01-05D117FF598F@iii.ca>
References: <CABcZeBNdd9Ze1G3ZOpGHVKsGKBdhEAOzg4qt7XKnX75dhQyTkA@mail.gmail.com> <CABkgnnVjJTnTypBqL-YLMPwo0_RSdkMLgQvD+L03jwyt_ffDqQ@mail.gmail.com> <FFCA477F-653D-46FF-93CE-4338EA856C5C@iii.ca> <CABcZeBMS5x-wW24PAOOCMG8nM2Ac1fvi_y2XOekmgAeQHL056A@mail.gmail.com>
To: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1874)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/c7XjZU-CvChO1Q9UfHWUxdIg9WQ
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>, "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Default candidate pool size
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 May 2014 16:53:29 -0000
how about just adding the pool size to RTCConfiguration ? On May 18, 2014, at 9:26 AM, Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> wrote: > As far as I know, this has been agreed on, but the W3C spec has > never been updated to reflect it. > > -Ekr > > > > On Sat, May 17, 2014 at 11:04 AM, Cullen Jennings <fluffy@iii.ca> wrote: > > I think the JS app needs a way to say what it needs in the way of pool size. > > > On May 12, 2014, at 12:15 PM, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On 11 May 2014 17:18, Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> wrote: > >> > >> My personal opinion is that candidate pooling is useful here and we > >> should probably leave the default in the hands of the browser. I > >> could live with 0 however. > > > > I tend to agree. The selection of a default seems like a good > > opportunity for browsers to optimize. For instance, a mobile device > > might choose to defer gathering until it knows that it needs them; > > whereas a device with a good source of power might prefer the latency > > benefits associated with early gathering. No point in us specifying > > this. > > > > _______________________________________________ > > rtcweb mailing list > > rtcweb@ietf.org > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb > > > >
- [rtcweb] Default candidate pool size Eric Rescorla
- Re: [rtcweb] Default candidate pool size Martin Thomson
- Re: [rtcweb] Default candidate pool size Kiran Kumar Guduru
- Re: [rtcweb] Default candidate pool size Kiran Kumar Guduru
- Re: [rtcweb] Default candidate pool size Cullen Jennings
- Re: [rtcweb] Default candidate pool size Eric Rescorla
- Re: [rtcweb] Default candidate pool size Cullen Jennings
- Re: [rtcweb] Default candidate pool size Justin Uberti
- Re: [rtcweb] Default candidate pool size Eric Rescorla
- Re: [rtcweb] Default candidate pool size Justin Uberti
- Re: [rtcweb] Default candidate pool size Eric Rescorla
- Re: [rtcweb] Default candidate pool size Justin Uberti
- Re: [rtcweb] Default candidate pool size Martin Thomson