IETF Logo Mail Archive

[rtcweb] Locus of API discussion

Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 09 July 2013 15:33 UTC

Return-Path: <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84CD621F9D24 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Jul 2013 08:33:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.509
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.509 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.090, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tCqE4MHGWeH8 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Jul 2013 08:33:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ie0-x229.google.com (mail-ie0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::229]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 128EB21F9EE6 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Jul 2013 08:33:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ie0-f169.google.com with SMTP id 10so13381463ied.0 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 09 Jul 2013 08:33:08 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=b6QlIFM+8TZQ2ZXbloa5+C5MFnLrhPAQ3smNUQ7LWJU=; b=oTVxS89yEKLTe8UENkiXtqL+9NlqFEPrJ4JuCfjP3RHfOn3wab8JqIre4NiYdBdRBV 9F4rfD5Asz/ahaMf3o5XEiuPxZn2NbsQvpaYLCChu8dA1J0PTsftInPqRIZHEDlImxgp 1DDI+m3Y/Gf2cKXONdL0FVCnwUKNpk9HrpzAcynOf/egR6IfhuI7sB3voFzXl9H9ReHH MWWHSEh4cRZ3Zran6ZOnIJwlVhyCD7ceLJ8zcQR6az8cu4/aHGuu5PJAWm43KdTJ2eeI wR1BWnWQu5tRRQzIhfsjPMAI4O5s6pB5Uo7fzF+3ygVGxroULUjdaeJ/UUW/Wjj/E/xd Tv8Q==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.42.52.6 with SMTP id h6mr8706289icg.5.1373383988704; Tue, 09 Jul 2013 08:33:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.42.29.202 with HTTP; Tue, 9 Jul 2013 08:33:08 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2013 08:33:08 -0700
Message-ID: <CA+9kkMAaaT5RRLUrGvzs0zB0jXRQdHLm5HJH5-VkT5p1ZetVPQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
To: rtcweb@ietf.org, public-webrtc@w3.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="20cf3036361fc983b104e115e0b4"
Subject: [rtcweb] Locus of API discussion
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2013 15:33:09 -0000

Howdy,

The recent set of API discussions has been spread across both the rtcweb
and public-webrtc mailing lists.  That's making it both harder to follow
and harder for folks to work out who is saying what under which rules.  The
chairs of both groups believe that the right place for the discussion to
continue should be public-webrtc.  Please direct follow-ups on this topic
to that list.

regards,

Ted Hardie

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email