IETF Logo Mail Archive

[rtcweb] Reflection of SRTP/SDES discussions at IETF 87?

Bernard Aboba <bernard_aboba@hotmail.com> Mon, 04 November 2013 23:14 UTC

Return-Path: <bernard_aboba@hotmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1405C11E821A for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Nov 2013 15:14:17 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.25
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.25 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.348, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id M-iCNkUWl9xs for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Nov 2013 15:14:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from blu0-omc3-s32.blu0.hotmail.com (blu0-omc3-s32.blu0.hotmail.com [65.55.116.107]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7856A21E8267 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 4 Nov 2013 15:14:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from BLU169-W55 ([65.55.116.72]) by blu0-omc3-s32.blu0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Mon, 4 Nov 2013 15:14:11 -0800
X-TMN: [CJVwE9hOvd/kFe2oDFE8eMjMB7JS6nne]
X-Originating-Email: [bernard_aboba@hotmail.com]
Message-ID: <BLU169-W5564795A82C4385F7DD58F93F60@phx.gbl>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_3be80354-82da-4de9-96bd-345517333d1d_"
From: Bernard Aboba <bernard_aboba@hotmail.com>
To: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2013 15:14:10 -0800
Importance: Normal
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 04 Nov 2013 23:14:11.0251 (UTC) FILETIME=[92053030:01CED9B3]
Subject: [rtcweb] Reflection of SRTP/SDES discussions at IETF 87?
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2013 23:14:17 -0000

At IETF 87 we had a discussion of SRTP/SDES.  In looking at the most recent version of several documents, I didn't see the consensus of that discussion reflected.  Was that because the consensus in the room wasn't verified on the list, or some other reason?  Or maybe I missed the text somewhere?  Here is what seemingly relates to this topic: 
 
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-rtcweb-security-arch-07 Section 5.5: 
 
   [OPEN ISSUE:  What should the settings be here?  MUST?]
   Implementations MAY support SDES for media traffic for backward
   compatibility purposes.
 
[BA] As I recall, the room consensus was MUST NOT with respect to SRTP/SDES, no? 
 
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-rtcweb-security
 
[BA] Nothing related to key management (which seems fine). 
 
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-rtcweb-rtp-usage
 
[BA]  The security and security-architecture documents are referenced normatively in Section 13 Security Considerations (which seems fine).

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email