Re: [rtcweb] DTLS, DTLS-SRTP, and 5-tuples

Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net> Wed, 11 March 2015 14:14 UTC

Return-Path: <ibc@aliax.net>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CECE21ACDB9 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Mar 2015 07:14:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.678
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.678 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jz3L1VcL9cTU for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Mar 2015 07:14:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qc0-f169.google.com (mail-qc0-f169.google.com [209.85.216.169]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BA10A1ACDB7 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Mar 2015 07:14:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by qcxr5 with SMTP id r5so10461169qcx.4 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Mar 2015 07:14:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=SDD3TiyO+rJp7apwR6cl43qiMQ4Iu4EIZE34WQ40R/A=; b=aCE9ZsM0hAEXc95Pfjh3OyMoNMq0rhOKv0NaupSKcGz7eZ47e+83QST6Y0BO4NFuQu hLbrDqCjor4XwXgd5ut77Lr8mgHDZNq+MMBzRgg8qujjTbgdWyDEWTBXUcJtyaRilXe9 KyIXPHXIOwd8t6HeXBxPCZNuA7Y86Pp9FnQs8vTuPPbdeH/V2Qd6rUDyburW2nXZ9njC CfiEWNlnI0llUSY4O9snxSurauKHAfjaw3Slhp8z6OvJ928RyDz6JWESZGSDTFim7ewz MNquBWTJ2GL9c+arSt89NY2pYXeTOO63w6oso0Ncjy5HaHnDPrMq+C+Zh5tvCpFWvl+L kRow==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkZgbpB8drEjnQxq+FdkVqrz68NySHn1BwCb0l2wKWyuZZHMFFyhMXNwxvudrqgWNfADKeB
X-Received: by 10.140.28.203 with SMTP id 69mr47578606qgz.5.1426083289016; Wed, 11 Mar 2015 07:14:49 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.96.214.137 with HTTP; Wed, 11 Mar 2015 07:14:28 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAD5OKxtCswToNzoZnnqJ5M66mjNjKJoA++WYNqN5155n+CWXsA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <54F74B02.1070902@jive.com> <CAD5OKxs8JYG3-Vvndi59ZrdPE7UTj22ozD4tcWTHgzWrHv=q7Q@mail.gmail.com> <54F756B2.60408@jive.com> <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1D726AD8@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <CAD5OKxu7py3HbrFjxTDZS5ECFzx7vd=wpjve-gT6gWwksjEu+g@mail.gmail.com> <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1D726B71@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <CABcZeBO1O6sA8MqvWkCDu3RPLz5-P2G65Us28i0baOavDnRT7Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAD5OKxuWCdgMR5Kxjv9BSwZ3Jm9kGXx9Pi-9FrfsnuQZ_91jAA@mail.gmail.com> <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1D726DC1@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <CALiegfkipJhsy7-40+=d9xMUf4RJGdn3_fABL3NN2KuFNvS2BA@mail.gmail.com> <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1D727570@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <CALiegfmfvz3NWSjcovGBytiOTbR6kFfyh0vx5cXoMJtytfGzRA@mail.gmail.com> <CAD5OKxsu3D0xHY-zYbDu1hyH_+4=3mWDvW2i98WCVZ+29BpKCw@mail.gmail.com> <CA5E97EE-99F8-44D8-B05B-C9EFDED1A9BB@vidyo.com> <2F467A7E-7A6C-4B1B-985A-0D9C089BE973@cisco.com> <CAOJ7v-1TjZOZ5G31vy_Gt73ADGLRay1RHVeMi=H6Q4=N1b6HLA@mail.gmail.com> <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1D7367A0@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <CALiegfmyp=v6thk4eLz7nL1BHh2Qj7jmC84tdG7ufg8HPXsVKA@mail.gmail.com> <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1D7369C9@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <CAD5OKxtCswToNzoZnnqJ5M66mjNjKJoA++WYNqN5155n+CWXsA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net>
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2015 15:14:28 +0100
Message-ID: <CALiegfmjqaV9oHe9RMFVGNs+jVN6rZaY6boY9iCwe8HExGtCSw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Roman Shpount <roman@telurix.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/iPwohvYmm6DmV7XdKxOXCCgVFZs>
Cc: Cullen Jennings <fluffy@cisco.com>, Jonathan Lennox <jonathan@vidyo.com>, "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] DTLS, DTLS-SRTP, and 5-tuples
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2015 14:14:51 -0000

2015-03-11 15:10 GMT+01:00 Roman Shpount <roman@telurix.com>:
> I think there is some confusion between the underlying link protocol used by
> candidates and the protocol running on top of ICE. I do not think TCP is
> defined as a protocol that can operate on top of ICE. It is defined in RFC
> 6544 using framing from RFC 4571, as a protocol for underlying links.
> Whatever protocol is defined on top of ICE should support operation on top
> of packetized communication protocol provided by ICE and should define how
> its packets can be demuxed from STUN packets used for ICE connectivity
> checks. So far things like RTP, DTLS, and SCTP fit such requirements. New
> things can be defined in the future. When they do, they should treat ICE a
> virtual communication channel that provides unreliable packet transport with
> no order guarantees which can span multiple 5-tuples.

Exactly. Please Christer, don't go to layer 4 protocols. Neither IPv6
can run over an ICE initiated "virtual transport" ;)


-- 
Iñaki Baz Castillo
<ibc@aliax.net>