IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] #13: Transport of DATA_CHANNEL_OPEN

Matthew Kaufman <matthew@matthew.at> Wed, 24 April 2013 15:19 UTC

Return-Path: <matthew@matthew.at>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01E5021F8691 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Apr 2013 08:19:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.43
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.43 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_AT=0.424, HOST_EQ_AT=0.745]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TkQZRIfKxR7p for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Apr 2013 08:19:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from where.matthew.at (where.matthew.at [198.202.199.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AE4521F85EB for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 Apr 2013 08:19:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.10.155.2] (unknown [10.10.155.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by where.matthew.at (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FB811480CA for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 Apr 2013 08:19:09 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <5177F7EE.1010909@matthew.at>
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 08:19:10 -0700
From: Matthew Kaufman <matthew@matthew.at>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130328 Thunderbird/17.0.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: rtcweb@ietf.org
References: <066.3120a55540cacaa74ee5fda0b5273a48@trac.tools.ietf.org> <5174C8D2.40504@matthew.at>
In-Reply-To: <5174C8D2.40504@matthew.at>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] #13: Transport of DATA_CHANNEL_OPEN
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 15:19:15 -0000

On 4/21/2013 10:21 PM, Matthew Kaufman wrote:
> On 4/11/2013 4:04 PM, rtcweb issue tracker wrote:
>> #13: Transport of DATA_CHANNEL_OPEN
>>
>>   Comment on draft-jesup-rtcweb-data-protocol:
>>
>>   All DATA_CHANNEL_OPEN messages MUST be sent reliably and in-order.
>>
>>
>
> Ok, I've read the document and the whole discussion.
>
> Why do we need DATA_CHANNEL_OPEN messages?
>
> I can't understand the value of any of the things in there except 
> possibly the "Label" field, which is allowed to be empty anyway(?)
>

Today's additional messages have failed to answer my question above. If 
there's no answer, then I propose we get rid of it.

Matthew Kaufman

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email