IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] #13: Transport of DATA_CHANNEL_OPEN

Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no> Fri, 26 April 2013 05:30 UTC

Return-Path: <harald@alvestrand.no>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 477B821F97D9 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Apr 2013 22:30:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rXDJbtkWXAuy for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Apr 2013 22:30:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from eikenes.alvestrand.no (eikenes.alvestrand.no [158.38.152.233]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E260521F97AB for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 25 Apr 2013 22:30:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by eikenes.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id C866239E11A for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Fri, 26 Apr 2013 07:30:47 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at eikenes.alvestrand.no
Received: from eikenes.alvestrand.no ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (eikenes.alvestrand.no [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kXfXeABgbR5K for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Fri, 26 Apr 2013 07:30:47 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [10.10.4.232] (unknown [61.34.168.5]) by eikenes.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 54DE439E0E1 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Fri, 26 Apr 2013 07:30:45 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <517A1102.1010906@alvestrand.no>
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2013 07:30:42 +0200
From: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130329 Thunderbird/17.0.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: rtcweb@ietf.org
References: <066.3120a55540cacaa74ee5fda0b5273a48@trac.tools.ietf.org> <5174C8D2.40504@matthew.at> <5177F7EE.1010909@matthew.at> <CAJrXDUGa1=Nqq9WPL57=OkUU9mG7yHz0uzG1KncS8yVzbSAM0A@mail.gmail.com> <AE1A6B5FD507DC4FB3C5166F3A05A484162816C1@tk5ex14mbxc272.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
In-Reply-To: <AE1A6B5FD507DC4FB3C5166F3A05A484162816C1@tk5ex14mbxc272.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------060901080300070000080002"
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] #13: Transport of DATA_CHANNEL_OPEN
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2013 05:30:51 -0000

On 04/25/2013 07:28 AM, Matthew Kaufman (SKYPE) wrote:
>
> It is a much simpler question as there's only a couple of options 
> left... how about we throw it on the floor? That seems safest to me.
>
> I'd still love to hear why it is "needed" though.
>

The fact that Matthew doesn't want to accept the arguments for why it is 
needed doesn't seem relevant to me.

I think people have said enough times that they see value in the label 
concept, and they want some way to carry it. The OPEN message is a 
simple way to fill that need (and also makes some other aspects of setup 
simpler than they would otherwise be).

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email