IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] #13: Transport of DATA_CHANNEL_OPEN

Matthew Kaufman <matthew@matthew.at> Mon, 22 April 2013 05:21 UTC

Return-Path: <matthew@matthew.at>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D9BA21F85D6 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 21 Apr 2013 22:21:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.43
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.43 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_AT=0.424, HOST_EQ_AT=0.745]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VmDRUixVReoW for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 21 Apr 2013 22:21:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from where.matthew.at (where.matthew.at [198.202.199.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1141B21F85BF for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Sun, 21 Apr 2013 22:21:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.10.155.2] (unknown [10.10.155.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by where.matthew.at (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9B45230005 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Sun, 21 Apr 2013 22:21:21 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <5174C8D2.40504@matthew.at>
Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2013 22:21:22 -0700
From: Matthew Kaufman <matthew@matthew.at>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130328 Thunderbird/17.0.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: rtcweb@ietf.org
References: <066.3120a55540cacaa74ee5fda0b5273a48@trac.tools.ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <066.3120a55540cacaa74ee5fda0b5273a48@trac.tools.ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] #13: Transport of DATA_CHANNEL_OPEN
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2013 05:21:24 -0000

On 4/11/2013 4:04 PM, rtcweb issue tracker wrote:
> #13: Transport of DATA_CHANNEL_OPEN
>
>   Comment on draft-jesup-rtcweb-data-protocol:
>
>   All DATA_CHANNEL_OPEN messages MUST be sent reliably and in-order.
>
>

Ok, I've read the document and the whole discussion.

Why do we need DATA_CHANNEL_OPEN messages?

I can't understand the value of any of the things in there except 
possibly the "Label" field, which is allowed to be empty anyway(?)

Matthew Kaufman

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email