Re: [Lsr] Split was Re: Draft minutes for BFD @ IETF110

[Mahesh Jethanandani <[e-mail]>]

Hi John,

The surgery that I performed on the draft, and can be seen in the attached files both as a diff and the full file was to remove the mpls-te module dependency from this draft. We should therefore at least not be dependent on the ietf-te module.

Thanks



> On Jul 27, 2021, at 11:49 AM, John Scudder <jgs=[e-mail]> wrote:
> 
> RFC Editor state is MISSREF, as part of cluster C336: https://www.rfc-editor.org/cluster_info.php?cid=C336 <https://www.rfc-editor.org/cluster_info.php?cid=C336>. If I’m untangling the information there correctly, I think it’s blocked on (at least) draft-ietf-teas-yang-te. 
> 
> Was the surgery that Tom mentions, expected to clear it out of MISSREF? If so, please give me some more details (either in this thread or offline) and I can check in with the RFC Editor.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> —John
> 
>> On Jul 27, 2021, at 10:56 AM, Reshad Rahman <[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> Adding John (AD).
>> 
>> On Tuesday, July 27, 2021, 10:45:07 a.m. EDT, tom petch <[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> From: Reshad Rahman <[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>>
>> Sent: 21 May 2021 00:03
>> 
>> <I should have sent this a few weeks ago when it got done>
>> 
>> FYI, Mahesh did the extraction of the mpls-te from draft-ietf-bfd-yang and it's been submitted to the RFC Editor.
>> 
>> <tp>
>> Two months have passed and I see no change in the RFC Editor queue.  Whatever was done would appear to have been not enough.  I was expecting an action by the AD to be required and have seen no sign thereof which may be relevant.
>> 
>> Tom Petch
>> 
>> 
>> Regards,
>> Reshad.
>> 
>> On 2021-03-22, 3:30 PM, "Rtg-bfd on behalf of Yingzhen Qu" <[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]> on behalf of [e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>> wrote:
>> 
>>     Hi,
>> 
>>     I also support the split of ietf-bfd-mpls-te module from the base BFD module, so modules like ietf-ospf and ietf-isis can progress.
>> 
>>     Thanks,
>>     Yingzhen
>> 
>>     > On Mar 22, 2021, at 2:33 AM, tom petch <[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>> wrote:
>>     >
>>     >
>>     >
>>     > From: Rtg-bfd <[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>> on behalf of Reshad Rahman <reshad=[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>>
>>     > Sent: 19 March 2021 18:58
>>     > To: rtg-bfd@ietf. <mailto:rtg-bfd@ietf.> org
>>     > Subject: Draft minutes for BFD @ IETF110
>>     >
>>     > BFD WG,
>>     >
>>     > Draft minutes have been posted @ https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/minutes-110-bfd/ <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/minutes-110-bfd/__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!TG4x_ssMaQlMDdVu3BrBywJ1enW0qjsLSg-0f9CKkecSVPEAfcfXuCwr08mLUw$>
>>     >
>>     > Please provide comments to the list by April 2nd.
>>     > <tp>
>>     >
>>     > I support Acee's suggestion that the TE part should be split from the BFD YANG draft so that the other three WG, who have been held up for years, can progress.
>>     >
>>     > Tom Petch
>>     >
>>     > Copying the LSR WG.
>>     >
>>     >
>>     > Meeting recording is @ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vSqfJJ3gOc0 <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vSqfJJ3gOc0__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!TG4x_ssMaQlMDdVu3BrBywJ1enW0qjsLSg-0f9CKkecSVPEAfcfXuCzjX4ck5A$>
>>     >
>>     > Regards,
>>     > Reshad.
>>     >
>>     > _______________________________________________
>>     > Lsr mailing list
>>     > [e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>
>>     > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!TG4x_ssMaQlMDdVu3BrBywJ1enW0qjsLSg-0f9CKkecSVPEAfcfXuCwv9DZorg$>

Mahesh Jethanandani
[e-mail]