IETF Logo Mail Archive

RE: Request for WG adoption of draft-mahesh-bfd-authentication

Mach Chen <mach.chen@huawei.com> Wed, 25 November 2015 03:26 UTC

Return-Path: <mach.chen@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91E6D1ACE32; Tue, 24 Nov 2015 19:26:10 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.785
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.785 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.585, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BDmaI-nO1eOJ; Tue, 24 Nov 2015 19:26:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9E2861AC3CC; Tue, 24 Nov 2015 19:26:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml403-hub.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id CAT65557; Wed, 25 Nov 2015 03:26:04 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from SZXEMA411-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.82.72.70) by lhreml403-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.217) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.235.1; Wed, 25 Nov 2015 03:26:03 +0000
Received: from SZXEMA510-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.3.73]) by szxema411-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.82.72.70]) with mapi id 14.03.0235.001; Wed, 25 Nov 2015 11:26:00 +0800
From: Mach Chen <mach.chen@huawei.com>
To: "Reshad Rahman (rrahman)" <rrahman@cisco.com>, "rtg-bfd@ietf.org" <rtg-bfd@ietf.org>, "draft-mahesh-bfd-authentication@ietf.org" <draft-mahesh-bfd-authentication@ietf.org>
Subject: RE: Request for WG adoption of draft-mahesh-bfd-authentication
Thread-Topic: Request for WG adoption of draft-mahesh-bfd-authentication
Thread-Index: AQHRI4t1BhxwWi4DrkqzzQbDKMhgLp6sGpYw
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 03:26:00 +0000
Message-ID: <F73A3CB31E8BE34FA1BBE3C8F0CB2AE28B670473@SZXEMA510-MBX.china.huawei.com>
References: <D2747638.109021%rrahman@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <D2747638.109021%rrahman@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US, zh-CN
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.111.102.135]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_F73A3CB31E8BE34FA1BBE3C8F0CB2AE28B670473SZXEMA510MBXchi_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
X-Mirapoint-Virus-RAPID-Raw: score=unknown(0), refid=str=0001.0A020203.56552A4C.0119, ss=1, re=0.000, recu=0.000, reip=0.000, cl=1, cld=1, fgs=0, ip=169.254.3.73, so=2013-06-18 04:22:30, dmn=2013-03-21 17:37:32
X-Mirapoint-Loop-Id: ded1b7647bea6261f1c6ff29c03493e5
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtg-bfd/KC0f0PI0kOchj_kdAh1vKdPKC6k>
X-BeenThere: rtg-bfd@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "RTG Area: Bidirectional Forwarding Detection DT" <rtg-bfd.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtg-bfd>, <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtg-bfd/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtg-bfd@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-bfd>, <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 03:26:10 -0000

Hi,

I have read the document and think it's useful, so I support the adoption.

Best regards,
Mach

From: Rtg-bfd [mailto:rtg-bfd-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Reshad Rahman (rrahman)
Sent: Friday, November 20, 2015 8:03 PM
To: rtg-bfd@ietf.org; draft-mahesh-bfd-authentication@ietf.org
Subject: Request for WG adoption of draft-mahesh-bfd-authentication

BFD WG members,

Please indicate to the WG mailing list whether you would support or not support BFD WG adoption of the following document.

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-mahesh-bfd-authentication/

Authors, as was mentioned at IETF94, you should get your proposal reviewed by the security group.

Regards,
Jeff & Reshad.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email