IETF 105
Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org> Tue, 02 July 2019 19:03 UTC
Return-Path: <jhaas@slice.pfrc.org>
X-Original-To: rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 916A312071B for <rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Jul 2019 12:03:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PsjlxTmw0M7W for <rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Jul 2019 12:03:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from slice.pfrc.org (slice.pfrc.org [67.207.130.108]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D42691207AB for <rtg-bfd@ietf.org>; Tue, 2 Jul 2019 12:02:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by slice.pfrc.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 4B18B1E2F2; Tue, 2 Jul 2019 15:04:23 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Tue, 02 Jul 2019 15:04:22 -0400
From: Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org>
To: rtg-bfd@ietf.org
Subject: IETF 105
Message-ID: <20190702190422.GC3974@pfrc.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtg-bfd/NxMWbGfdJCVObKh152PRffEpEaM>
X-BeenThere: rtg-bfd@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "RTG Area: Bidirectional Forwarding Detection DT" <rtg-bfd.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtg-bfd>, <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtg-bfd/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtg-bfd@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-bfd>, <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Jul 2019 19:03:04 -0000
Working Group, Reshad had put out a call for presentations for IETF 105 in mid-June. As of this time, we don't currently have any agenda requests. A quick status of current work: - BFD for vxlan is undergoing post WGLC expert review at the request of our Area Director. - BFD Authentication drafts need discussion in the working group on how to progress or not. - Unsolicited BFD is stable, and a trivial draft. We've received a prod from the authors asking if the next step is WGLC. - BFD for Large Packets is stable, and waiting on implementations. - BFD in Demand Mode has discussion pending with author and Area Director. Potential future work: - RFC 5884 bis. (RFC 5884 authors willing to contribute.) - BFD v2 or not. Greg seeded the discussion at IETF 104. BFD as a working group needs to meet only if it advances discussion on our work. If we don't have anything requiring group discussion outside of mailing list, we may consider canceling our timeslot. -- Jeff
- IETF 105 Jeffrey Haas
- Re: IETF 105 Mahesh Jethanandani