Re: Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-bfd-unsolicited (ending 16 August, 2020)

Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 18 August 2020 03:44 UTC

Return-Path: <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABB5F3A16F0 for <rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Aug 2020 20:44:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XVNs-gQkaECw for <rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Aug 2020 20:44:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pf1-x433.google.com (mail-pf1-x433.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::433]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 207863A16F7 for <rtg-bfd@ietf.org>; Mon, 17 Aug 2020 20:44:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pf1-x433.google.com with SMTP id x25so9293343pff.4 for <rtg-bfd@ietf.org>; Mon, 17 Aug 2020 20:44:48 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=content-transfer-encoding:from:mime-version:subject:date:message-id :references:cc:in-reply-to:to; bh=gTFnUe1TmYgh5YtYsDRTTdPSkze8F74mQ0Cv59uSol0=; b=S1R4bEvroISp572TrNok1pH6GCLevtXai3TWUUNgrp85KB9wEQh8sE6u9Ps54B6HyL fquodmUaT3lL04n2Yt70KX1/pP0gJDqNgT6R1DuUdbTBJ2tkpEqeZkZawEZsH9haFIKI iQ0qLSYYB6nwTj65iL15YUWu0SO0r21833NhPEWAmwwxOOCHPm4xzh8UKWsofmqwh+js Zv7RtcR8EKvj3cX/ov8SBUvj50ghmPMPjXhcygJF0sT5cEIpOj32UnQxcrHbhDd/Gkvl 62+kcQeOvl4aXLcqHy+0JSnILRobJWg0VdICUfICy6t1J847s414YIe/5wydPnvrb4EO hkYQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:content-transfer-encoding:from:mime-version :subject:date:message-id:references:cc:in-reply-to:to; bh=gTFnUe1TmYgh5YtYsDRTTdPSkze8F74mQ0Cv59uSol0=; b=X816xOzo1I+Fb+hb8ByJi21211s2mNuVJpsfdSOKserrXVOgYhjA+yecLR3ZFp5dFO FuAmxRgGeB2yKVC+KpMN1mK1OnUwESQrWUGoBn3XYf/0aE2ZRbQUXDdmGlGJffMKp+ui 2K0Y6gLbaP3PTHLX7pWj68MOFUC8DJ2/++0ktpmfJZSKKgamr2yvT5uiOixi/eBbw/Xb uLBr2KfoMYOGGyr7NbQ3YVR3KgXdW4vv0j6Yvf5YewzPoai+DvmvL5Ol8St1GgpYItdG n3uH3dC3nEr8gQgFTTudbcV76GwvHKQO67YS3FNE4mPuQJJI8hbvIWcvTeoJ7E5ZkHiJ FbhA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531rL27WdXARmpZBXKYUdzH4OXs94Jv5X8wIb1dYffto8bsV2hbe kET6vY04v08fHM1IA3ZY6NMlhnnZf34=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzeIGh5aoqWRQdkkXvcEtSSiSha0tOJoaVJOjBjj5AFYqk7L7CJhoMVAfoB2sdDwDXNoPiJkg==
X-Received: by 2002:a63:4c11:: with SMTP id z17mr11795465pga.152.1597722287516; Mon, 17 Aug 2020 20:44:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.12] (c-73-63-232-212.hsd1.ca.comcast.net. [73.63.232.212]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id t25sm22883267pfl.198.2020.08.17.20.44.46 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 17 Aug 2020 20:44:46 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
From: Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Subject: Re: Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-bfd-unsolicited (ending 16 August, 2020)
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2020 20:44:44 -0700
Message-Id: <118F68D1-8881-4856-9C18-8780CEA01B94@gmail.com>
References: <BY5PR11MB4337DB9D4836800F9F91906CC15C0@BY5PR11MB4337.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Cc: Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org>, "rtg-bfd@ietf.org" <rtg-bfd@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <BY5PR11MB4337DB9D4836800F9F91906CC15C0@BY5PR11MB4337.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
To: "Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)" <ginsberg=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (17G68)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtg-bfd/uFq7jNMQYsqc4sm8sEphOJkpElI>
X-BeenThere: rtg-bfd@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "RTG Area: Bidirectional Forwarding Detection DT" <rtg-bfd.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtg-bfd>, <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtg-bfd/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtg-bfd@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-bfd>, <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2020 03:44:50 -0000

I support this document with exactly same points Les’s made, it should progress as informational.

Regards,
Jeff

> On Aug 17, 2020, at 20:36, Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) <ginsberg=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
> 
> Sorry to be tardy in responding...
> 
> As I stated almost 2 years ago when this draft was introduced:
> 
> a)The problem the draft is addressing is real and the solution useful
> 
> b)There are implementations which have already addressed this problem with no interoperability issues
> 
> c)I do not see that any changes have been made to the BFD protocol (e.g. RFC 5881)
> 
> Therefore, I think this should go forward - but as Informational.
> 
>   Les
> 
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Rtg-bfd <rtg-bfd-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Jeffrey Haas
>> Sent: Monday, August 17, 2020 1:45 PM
>> To: rtg-bfd@ietf.org
>> Subject: Re: Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-bfd-unsolicited (ending 16
>> August, 2020)
>> 
>>> On Tue, Aug 04, 2020 at 09:21:22AM -0400, Jeffrey Haas wrote:
>>> Working Group,
>>> 
>>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bfd-unsolicited/
>>> 
>>> With apologies to the authors of BFD unsolicited, this document is past due
>>> for Working Group Last Call.  The primary holdup on the document had
>> been
>>> last minute interaction with the RFC Editor with regard to its impact on the
>>> BFD Yang model.  That work had completed some time ago.  (The Yang
>> model,
>>> however, is still lingering in MISREF state.)
>>> 
>>> This begins a last call period ending on 16 August.
>> 
>> The last call period has ended with a few comments from Greg and Raj that
>> should be addressed before we continue.
>> 
>> It'd also be helpful to hear from additional reviewers before we advance
>> this document.
>> 
>> -- Jeff
>