Comments on draft-ietf-bfd-vxlan-01
Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com> Fri, 17 August 2018 16:20 UTC
Return-Path: <d3e3e3@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37759130EA0 for <rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 17 Aug 2018 09:20:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.75
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.75 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id adLKEaVR-nmB for <rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 17 Aug 2018 09:20:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-it0-x22f.google.com (mail-it0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c0b::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 50CDE130D7A for <rtg-bfd@ietf.org>; Fri, 17 Aug 2018 09:20:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-it0-x22f.google.com with SMTP id 139-v6so12462246itf.0 for <rtg-bfd@ietf.org>; Fri, 17 Aug 2018 09:20:20 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=6qtj+7560U5BB1qw6g54vNTXNmb4j6/mssmnioi65Co=; b=jvl7SRb12y9tkcjeotAgqKU1OIPyW4I7AQw9IME6DkygaxnsRYcKLMwMtTmkfUo+KS 0MXznCuNWrj0e48bdBBQ1QS2zk0fb4qOCnpcBBmijvgy6wIW3Kg+2l4CDV6DsKNK9PTp XqTanHE91I5ta/MqEYLNN6wzDUDlPMlpQwT+vOx0No1tTBli7G8I4J1JaNy1sjPmn05I msvwOJYSMMWoX2ZTliHg8u8hCOvAlqyg76lZNl5AvMDzSVfNDtXzlDHNDbnH8pJrviwA JPWLUuM22jdo+cNdxr1557z7INSN5ldA00z6AU8AMZMuTmt/PJhpU+O9xXk29oQvJ0EH eCzw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=6qtj+7560U5BB1qw6g54vNTXNmb4j6/mssmnioi65Co=; b=WP/YMVpY08ei8S/LZwgl18es3SPeMpnBYn6SrDJi9bc3HsFfNoH6Q/sekMBeuDcCXD mwRdDOlnO0s4+leaXX43EvOjKpbpjF+PVRZNaOmfZ7cPqUrgBpE8Xtx2NnKp9tW3a6wX zJTzcOrNJjdihRTQv5QOW5VIJrzmKOouiJrPJG8Oku4CoTmqkXwg2UMxaXA0+yW6TB3t daVMsEuNi8jyvIjXMiu9b6RtqRNl+boiKm67eQzxX+eBT4VtyvLNy5or9UfJNM12J/96 fee3rnKTZZHZSx9sub1gSa9FRncnXcu76Djz8XwFRI1kE2jIvbcd5kJLzpzBriR37NRr /3mg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOUpUlHo4iZ8nMwskuY3QJG3F+Ww1ZEuYjA1rlPFfcuIaW0m6BSB6iJf evwf0zLJGaqKKlXGWtE5ZvJO5BMCYI9Pni7OIobt7g==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA+uWPyFeATgKP7Bpb5N0rgflCgTpsTUuKjs9G/37XK0anO7HvLpNt22o5qIwso5ej5jXsXwHLRd0km7gIAN1tAf2kg=
X-Received: by 2002:a24:ad45:: with SMTP id a5-v6mr26466555itj.0.1534522819225; Fri, 17 Aug 2018 09:20:19 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 2002:a6b:4d0:0:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Fri, 17 Aug 2018 09:20:03 -0700 (PDT)
From: Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2018 12:20:03 -0400
Message-ID: <CAF4+nEE1OnXE-xhZ5C8TWZ1VRu7__3zqpj-w+7thx6w1HQh3dQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Comments on draft-ietf-bfd-vxlan-01
To: rtg-bfd WG <rtg-bfd@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtg-bfd/zm6f3ONbAJYkZteaNhuHzQj7Aj4>
X-BeenThere: rtg-bfd@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: "RTG Area: Bidirectional Forwarding Detection DT" <rtg-bfd.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtg-bfd>, <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtg-bfd/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtg-bfd@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-bfd>, <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2018 16:20:21 -0000
Hi, I have reviewed this draft and have two main suggestions: There appears to be some conflict between the 2nd paragraph of Section 1 and the 4th paragraph. Paragraph 2 talks about layer 2 and 3 underlay while the 4th paragraph implies only layer 3. Also, I recommend that a request (template, RFC 7042) for assignment of a MAC address as mentioned in the IANA Considerations section be submitted now or at least soon. A single MAC address is cheap and requires only Expert approval which I think would be forthcoming. I have additional minor editorial suggestions I have sent directly to the authors. Preferably with my suggestions incorporated :-) I think this draft is ready for WG Last Call. Thanks, Donald =============================== Donald E. Eastlake 3rd +1-508-333-2270 (cell) 1424 Pro Shop Court, Davenport, FL 33896 USA d3e3e3@gmail.com
- Comments on draft-ietf-bfd-vxlan-01 Donald Eastlake
- Re: Comments on draft-ietf-bfd-vxlan-01 Donald Eastlake
- Re: Comments on draft-ietf-bfd-vxlan-01 Greg Mirsky