Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on draft-ietf-rtgwg-routing-types-16: (with COMMENT)

Kathleen Moriarty <Kathleen.Moriarty.ietf@gmail.com> Wed, 11 October 2017 15:45 UTC

Return-Path: <Kathleen.Moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtgwg@ietf.org
Delivered-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C46C712008A; Wed, 11 Oct 2017 08:45:27 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Kathleen Moriarty <Kathleen.Moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-rtgwg-routing-types@ietf.org, Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com>, rtgwg-chairs@ietf.org, jefftant.ietf@gmail.com, rtgwg@ietf.org
Subject: Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on draft-ietf-rtgwg-routing-types-16: (with COMMENT)
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.63.1
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <150773672779.24763.13444803098382095385.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2017 08:45:27 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtgwg/-pSZC3P6QaG7sKvrpPEYQVkY8UY>
X-BeenThere: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
List-Id: Routing Area Working Group <rtgwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtgwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2017 15:45:28 -0000

Kathleen Moriarty has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-rtgwg-routing-types-16: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rtgwg-routing-types/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

It would be good to call out the elements that are identifiers in the security
considerations section as the ones that might have an impact on security and
privacy.  The text in 7950 is good, but just adding something to list the
identifiers or state that identifiers may be of concern would be an
improvement.  Thanks.