IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on draft-ietf-rtgwg-routing-types-16: (with COMMENT)

Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com> Wed, 11 October 2017 16:01 UTC

Return-Path: <bclaise@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F23D134219; Wed, 11 Oct 2017 09:01:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.501
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.501 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RnDZHEGT_uo7; Wed, 11 Oct 2017 09:01:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aer-iport-3.cisco.com (aer-iport-3.cisco.com [173.38.203.53]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1BF3D13339A; Wed, 11 Oct 2017 09:01:10 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1406; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1507737671; x=1508947271; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date: mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=0zU0GzyWuqC6ngJEynYIcCAYWXZKRdijVrhcF1LKSwM=; b=fiE2TX5MzMjkXtVxH7zRIun/bayAaRbusO+kexNoHR0+yMhUeuHGntxF VkHq9/hFn5iZcyCysDFYlfNhYlATsKeu3SeFcy4XxNL0V0uzzbZHRuxlT 7dUEwUH7RAx6l/SAsFo/jR6+NhAqTaHz1vGGUzT3deLjcENScBiWshoNR M=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0DKAAAvP95Z/xbLJq1dGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBBwEBAQEBhD9uJ4N6ih90kA2WUQ6CBAojhRgChR4YAQIBAQEBAQEBayiFHgYjFUEQCxoCJgICVwYBDAgBAYogEKlsgieLMwEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBGQWBDoIfg1iCFQuCdIRSARIBgzKCYQWKE5cqh16NC4IUhXODWiSHCo4Eh1+BOR84gQMLMiEIHRVJhU+BUD42AYgVgjUBAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.43,362,1503360000"; d="scan'208";a="656296906"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-1.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 11 Oct 2017 16:01:09 +0000
Received: from [10.55.221.36] (ams-bclaise-nitro3.cisco.com [10.55.221.36]) by aer-core-1.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v9BG18rP005118; Wed, 11 Oct 2017 16:01:08 GMT
Subject: Re: Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on draft-ietf-rtgwg-routing-types-16: (with COMMENT)
To: Kathleen Moriarty <Kathleen.Moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-rtgwg-routing-types@ietf.org, rtgwg-chairs@ietf.org, jefftant.ietf@gmail.com, rtgwg@ietf.org
References: <150773672779.24763.13444803098382095385.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <d894d427-2369-bb9a-739a-5266b02b67aa@cisco.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2017 18:01:10 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <150773672779.24763.13444803098382095385.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtgwg/XW2d0NM4OWvg6j4nvlMLvG7bgmw>
X-BeenThere: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Working Group <rtgwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtgwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2017 16:01:13 -0000

Hi Kathleen,
> Kathleen Moriarty has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-rtgwg-routing-types-16: No Objection
>
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
>
>
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>
>
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rtgwg-routing-types/
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> It would be good to call out the elements that are identifiers in the security
> considerations section as the ones that might have an impact on security and
> privacy.  The text in 7950 is good, but just adding something to list the
> identifiers or state that identifiers may be of concern would be an
> improvement.  Thanks.
This draft only contains the typedefs and not the leave instances.
The privacy considerations should be on the instances, so the typedef usage.
For example, the privacy considerations would be different if the 
instance is read only or read write.

Regards, Benoit
>
>
> .
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email