IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on draft-ietf-rtgwg-routing-types-16: (with COMMENT)

"Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com> Wed, 11 October 2017 17:53 UTC

Return-Path: <acee@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05D94133070; Wed, 11 Oct 2017 10:53:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.521
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.521 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1_Hf5yzsGd_P; Wed, 11 Oct 2017 10:53:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com [173.37.86.74]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1CFCA1323B8; Wed, 11 Oct 2017 10:53:50 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=3888; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1507744430; x=1508954030; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=POBaoJCUH3cS2UJe000jSyaSoStKEJCrG655ERUgx6s=; b=JwABbpvpuOlYVhBcoUEyuoKt3p1k5bMS489bQnaNd2A5ibPEcgCk82e6 xA2czrpywrm0qIo7M7h/jmFywEDSxC9yPaoRp01C18HIf77qr1cvNsLLn iD8QFfKbAmzQP3nrVSIua5yOMbIB09D0GrVxdofZdh8/eFYKLvBlvy4Oq o=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0C6AACMWd5Z/4ENJK1eGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBBwEBAQEBg1tkbicHg3OKH48tgXaIRY1qDoIECiOFGAIahEU/GAECAQEBAQEBAWsohR4BBSMRRRACAQgYAgImAgICHxEVEAIEDgWKDAMVEKl+gieHRA2DYgEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBARsFgQ6CH4IHhVeBDoJegXQBEgEfF4J8gmEFihOWbjwCh1yIEoR5ghSFc4N+hwqKHYJeiDsCERkBgTgBHziBAwt4FUmFT4FOdgGIFYEkgREBAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.43,362,1503360000"; d="scan'208";a="296180945"
Received: from alln-core-9.cisco.com ([173.36.13.129]) by rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 11 Oct 2017 17:53:49 +0000
Received: from XCH-RTP-007.cisco.com (xch-rtp-007.cisco.com [64.101.220.147]) by alln-core-9.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v9BHrmWR017702 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 11 Oct 2017 17:53:49 GMT
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com (64.101.220.155) by XCH-RTP-007.cisco.com (64.101.220.147) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1320.4; Wed, 11 Oct 2017 13:53:47 -0400
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) by XCH-RTP-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) with mapi id 15.00.1320.000; Wed, 11 Oct 2017 13:53:47 -0400
From: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
To: Kathleen Moriarty <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>
CC: "Benoit Claise (bclaise)" <bclaise@cisco.com>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-rtgwg-routing-types@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-rtgwg-routing-types@ietf.org>, "rtgwg-chairs@ietf.org" <rtgwg-chairs@ietf.org>, Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com>, "rtgwg@ietf.org" <rtgwg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on draft-ietf-rtgwg-routing-types-16: (with COMMENT)
Thread-Topic: Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on draft-ietf-rtgwg-routing-types-16: (with COMMENT)
Thread-Index: AQHTQqf35iqC3s+z9EWQoWk4KdoIeaLfEg0AgAAAY4D//8QpgIAAUmWA///FaYA=
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2017 17:53:47 +0000
Message-ID: <D603D2BB.CE3C7%acee@cisco.com>
References: <150773672779.24763.13444803098382095385.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <d894d427-2369-bb9a-739a-5266b02b67aa@cisco.com> <CAHbuEH4jXKmh3YH9-d7yMsFk09gPKu+RYJBhSeLHT_LKsNAKeg@mail.gmail.com> <D603BD33.CE36E%acee@cisco.com> <CAHbuEH6hCiun-b3D2atBjMBF11Z_ysv5yqf3T0tZzs4gUztN8A@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAHbuEH6hCiun-b3D2atBjMBF11Z_ysv5yqf3T0tZzs4gUztN8A@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.116.152.195]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <C55CAAC075357949B56AD13C565456A9@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtgwg/tDEYyabmKXn1CyDN7IJLLqaGHgA>
X-BeenThere: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Working Group <rtgwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtgwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2017 17:53:52 -0000

Hi Kathleen, 

On 10/11/17, 1:23 PM, "Kathleen Moriarty"
<kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:

>On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 12:28 PM, Acee Lindem (acee) <acee@cisco.com>
>wrote:
>> Hi Kathleen,
>>
>>
>>
>> On 10/11/17, 12:02 PM, "Kathleen Moriarty"
>> <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 12:01 PM, Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>
>>>wrote:
>>>> Hi Kathleen,
>>>>
>>>>> Kathleen Moriarty has entered the following ballot position for
>>>>> draft-ietf-rtgwg-routing-types-16: No Objection
>>>>>
>>>>> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
>>>>> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut
>>>>>this
>>>>> introductory paragraph, however.)
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Please refer to
>>>>>https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
>>>>> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
>>>>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rtgwg-routing-types/
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> 
>>>>>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> COMMENT:
>>>>> 
>>>>>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>
>>>>> It would be good to call out the elements that are identifiers in the
>>>>> security
>>>>> considerations section as the ones that might have an impact on
>>>>>security
>>>>> and
>>>>> privacy.  The text in 7950 is good, but just adding something to list
>>>>>the
>>>>> identifiers or state that identifiers may be of concern would be an
>>>>> improvement.  Thanks.
>>>>
>>>> This draft only contains the typedefs and not the leave instances.
>>>> The privacy considerations should be on the instances, so the typedef
>>>>usage.
>>>> For example, the privacy considerations would be different if the
>>>>instance
>>>> is read only or read write.
>>>
>>>Thanks for the quick reply.  Could that be made clear instead of a
>>>vague sentence in the Security Considerations then so the
>>>considerations are understood (an minimal)?
>>
>> Are you familiar with the YANG language? Would it make it less vague if
>>if
>> “data definitions” were replaced by “type definitions (i.e., typedef
>> statements)” and “security considerations” were replaced by “security
>>and
>> privacy consideration”?
>
>Hi Acee,
>
>Yes, that is a nice and simple improvement.

Great - I will provide in the next update.

Thanks,
Acee


>
>Thank you,
>Kathleen
>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Acee
>>
>>>
>>>Thanks,
>>>Kathleen
>>>>
>>>> Regards, Benoit
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> .
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>--
>>>
>>>Best regards,
>>>Kathleen
>>
>
>
>
>-- 
>
>Best regards,
>Kathleen

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email