RE: Remote LFA

Gábor Sándor Enyedi <gabor.sandor.enyedi@ericsson.com> Tue, 11 October 2011 16:25 UTC

Return-Path: <gabor.sandor.enyedi@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5098621F8E1F for <rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Oct 2011 09:25:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.299
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.299 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YsLOmI87pak0 for <rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Oct 2011 09:25:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailgw10.se.ericsson.net (mailgw10.se.ericsson.net [193.180.251.61]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AD0221F8E05 for <rtgwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 11 Oct 2011 09:25:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb3d-b7c26ae0000035b9-15-4e946de4caf2
Received: from esessmw0191.eemea.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.124]) by mailgw10.se.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 51.68.13753.4ED649E4; Tue, 11 Oct 2011 18:25:08 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from ESESSCMS0359.eemea.ericsson.se ([153.88.115.176]) by esessmw0191.eemea.ericsson.se ([153.88.115.84]) with mapi; Tue, 11 Oct 2011 18:25:08 +0200
From: Gábor Sándor Enyedi <gabor.sandor.enyedi@ericsson.com>
To: Clarence Filsfils <cfilsfil@cisco.com>, "rtgwg@ietf.org" <rtgwg@ietf.org>, "Stewart Bryant (stbryant)" <stbryant@cisco.com>, "So, Ning" <ning.so@verizonbusiness.com>, "imc.shand@googlemail.com" <imc.shand@googlemail.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2011 18:25:06 +0200
Subject: RE: Remote LFA
Thread-Topic: Remote LFA
Thread-Index: AcyIMBLWjBD2uUgRTgGPsEA5LqSIRAAACi1A
Message-ID: <EFAB865EBEFB734CA1FABD543B2E0E2E20EA2EF9C6@ESESSCMS0359.eemea.ericsson.se>
References: <4E946A07.80403@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <4E946A07.80403@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: hu-HU, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: hu-HU, en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA==
X-BeenThere: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Working Group <rtgwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtgwg>
List-Post: <mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2011 16:25:10 -0000

Wow... I will read it as soon as I can, I'm curious what is the difference between this and http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-hokelek-rlfap-01 - first I thought that you're speaking about this one, since the title is very similar. At the last IETF we proposed this http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-csaszar-ipfrr-fn-01, but it seemed that everybody was strongly against giving up local protection (like it was a religious dogma). It's good to see that I'm not alone anymore!
BR,

Gabor

-----Original Message-----
From: rtgwg-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:rtgwg-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Clarence Filsfils
Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2011 6:09 PM
To: rtgwg@ietf.org; Stewart Bryant (stbryant); So, Ning; imc.shand@googlemail.com
Subject: Remote LFA

Please find the following submission complementing the LFA technology:

http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-shand-remote-lfa-00.txt

It drastically extends the coverage of LFA while keeping its simplicity.

Cheers,
Clarence
_______________________________________________
rtgwg mailing list
rtgwg@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg