IETF Logo Mail Archive

RE: Remote LFA

"Henderickx, Wim (Wim)" <wim.henderickx@alcatel-lucent.com> Tue, 11 October 2011 16:11 UTC

Return-Path: <wim.henderickx@alcatel-lucent.com>
X-Original-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D30221F8E11 for <rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Oct 2011 09:11:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.249
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.249 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EgpbaRLvPQVg for <rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Oct 2011 09:11:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smail6.alcatel.fr (smail6.alcatel.fr [64.208.49.42]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63A3A21F85EF for <rtgwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 11 Oct 2011 09:10:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from FRMRSSXCHHUB01.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com (FRMRSSXCHHUB01.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com [135.120.45.61]) by smail6.alcatel.fr (8.14.3/8.14.3/ICT) with ESMTP id p9BGAmcf001387 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NOT); Tue, 11 Oct 2011 18:10:49 +0200
Received: from FRMRSSXCHMBSB1.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com ([135.120.45.41]) by FRMRSSXCHHUB01.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com ([135.120.45.61]) with mapi; Tue, 11 Oct 2011 18:10:48 +0200
From: "Henderickx, Wim (Wim)" <wim.henderickx@alcatel-lucent.com>
To: Clarence Filsfils <cfilsfil@cisco.com>, "rtgwg@ietf.org" <rtgwg@ietf.org>, "Stewart Bryant (stbryant)" <stbryant@cisco.com>, "So, Ning" <ning.so@verizonbusiness.com>, "imc.shand@googlemail.com" <imc.shand@googlemail.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2011 18:10:44 +0200
Subject: RE: Remote LFA
Thread-Topic: Remote LFA
Thread-Index: AcyIMBVmzorv02cgS964C2Bj5mypmwAADFoA
Message-ID: <14C7F4F06DB5814AB0DE29716C4F6D671ADD9B44@FRMRSSXCHMBSB1.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com>
References: <4E946A07.80403@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <4E946A07.80403@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: nl-NL, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: nl-NL, en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.69 on 155.132.188.84
X-BeenThere: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Working Group <rtgwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtgwg>
List-Post: <mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2011 16:11:03 -0000

Clarence yes I saw this in the last IETF and i believe this has a lot of value 

-----Original Message-----
From: rtgwg-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:rtgwg-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Clarence Filsfils
Sent: dinsdag 11 oktober 2011 18:09
To: rtgwg@ietf.org; Stewart Bryant (stbryant); So, Ning; imc.shand@googlemail.com
Subject: Remote LFA

Please find the following submission complementing the LFA technology:

http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-shand-remote-lfa-00.txt

It drastically extends the coverage of LFA while keeping its simplicity.

Cheers,
Clarence
_______________________________________________
rtgwg mailing list
rtgwg@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email