WGLC on draft-ietf-rtgwg-rlfa-node-protection

Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com> Thu, 21 April 2016 07:42 UTC

Return-Path: <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25C1312E83C; Thu, 21 Apr 2016 00:42:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.698
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.698 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5MZj3gxz8a1G; Thu, 21 Apr 2016 00:42:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pa0-x22d.google.com (mail-pa0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A659912E7F7; Thu, 21 Apr 2016 00:42:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pa0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id er2so26522515pad.3; Thu, 21 Apr 2016 00:42:10 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=user-agent:date:subject:from:to:cc:message-id:thread-topic :mime-version; bh=v/+ILUu9byvcnImaOlYSg0CnqpMj/2sHmLUroXty3Bo=; b=x1JS0Zirp/Jc6vsjf2JpDs/h7lPoX6iU91a7t0vo+ErTegiJ7br4Y2KBASK9haNk8p JQ4+Sk48MhxZFATz8mGwesRj+43XzKIadHL4xH3Vg+89ZUeQZuPfZ36O5Pz2so90wQDg /XVicU60SraME6yhmoEycQMk5bjORyLJH3TAzNNaxhRgSfn2K/9ufN+Aag8+7pKwZf+J 2E9BqoaVoBq92LdS/5o9q9zFx7ipoLHk0qd1FvA6DQIA9hV8Upb5OBwIYqu2mJ/8G+Mu BhZ25GMoVCQ4K0Hxy1CrkbPURSbJUh2qfcTd6qL0809m9BW6h/T1iO4D9sWCmOVEd8Jy Yt4Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:user-agent:date:subject:from:to:cc:message-id :thread-topic:mime-version; bh=v/+ILUu9byvcnImaOlYSg0CnqpMj/2sHmLUroXty3Bo=; b=Jjw5NchEm+wY9sDhVrerWsxfTNhuEskts0Jf1nZwMwneJ9ZTqziyZFMQpZPG9IEtRk ydDEL9fKP/X4nxX+aKDorjXA/kolykpFTKgqwiguLO4QOQ5nhx8/qUPuWT1MbBZ4RKgb 7x1rPxFrQi78J8tZcvdae0OpAHF2oB9D7LHbzBpQwuV5PzGLgqJJMlf1HsgmIG+0upcT nqvoFV9Yvgna15cMA+OTDpE3solNQtHwffxjGgAOFIlYxMSYxvDN9/t1nNyQs6dG80Ac kUJtkNiixlGYGovshXaRkXc4Rz+EdQjar8jV7fQXumFu0Id/d+rkvlF0EWTLl63LF7oC KBYw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FWptI/Y1q/SZygeAnpQ/2lZWoFIi/vxu5zoNELhWJI/yrZbJNAyv08nVpMJTjuzNg==
X-Received: by 10.66.217.137 with SMTP id oy9mr15286272pac.103.1461224530138; Thu, 21 Apr 2016 00:42:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.13] ([76.126.247.72]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id vu5sm2407990pab.43.2016.04.21.00.42.09 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 21 Apr 2016 00:42:09 -0700 (PDT)
User-Agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/0.0.0.160212
Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2016 00:42:15 -0700
Subject: WGLC on draft-ietf-rtgwg-rlfa-node-protection
From: Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com>
To: rtgwg@ietf.org
Message-ID: <896EBEE8-E1D5-461B-9AD0-044BFE20F846@gmail.com>
Thread-Topic: WGLC on draft-ietf-rtgwg-rlfa-node-protection
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="B_3544044135_1320144618"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtgwg/CDGtNOgQQiJp0YPh1_v0nzn5ym8>
Cc: rtgwg-chairs <rtgwg-chairs@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Working Group <rtgwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtgwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2016 07:42:12 -0000

Dear RTGWG,
 
The authors of draft-ietf-rtgwg-rlfa-node-protection have told us that the
draft is ready for working group last call (WGLC).
 
Before we do the WGLC we want to do an IPR poll on the document.
 
This mail starts that IPR poll.
 
Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft-ietf-rtgwg-rlfa-node-protection?
 
If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
(see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).
 
Currently there are two IPR disclosures on draft-psarkar-rtgwg-rlfa-node-protection
(which was the pre-working group version of draft-ietf-rtgwg-rlfa-node-protection):
https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/2334/
https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/2346/

If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond to
this email regardless of whether or not you are aware of any relevant
IPR. *The response needs to be sent to the MPLS wg mailing list.* The
document will not advance to the next stage until a response has been
received from each author and contributor.
 
If you are on the RTGWG email list but are not listed as an author or
contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of any
IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules.
 
Thanks, 
Jeff and Chris