IETF Logo Mail Archive

RE: WGLC on draft-ietf-rtgwg-rlfa-node-protection

Chris Bowers <cbowers@juniper.net> Thu, 21 April 2016 14:17 UTC

Return-Path: <cbowers@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C63312EA24; Thu, 21 Apr 2016 07:17:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=junipernetworks.onmicrosoft.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wOHtn9xCPMti; Thu, 21 Apr 2016 07:17:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from na01-bn1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bn1on0737.outbound.protection.outlook.com [IPv6:2a01:111:f400:fc10::737]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5297B12EA0F; Thu, 21 Apr 2016 07:17:17 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=junipernetworks.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-juniper-net; h=From:To:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=WFdT/eqgHdrufWS0ujSWdQB25jXHg0962fVFhVnY2Mk=; b=SXNxGGlMbN5jWl+xxbDGtWjSmI2y3wvd7S7sWOYZmwDsIhptEVENFlbqn3UHFyw9s5HY7WWreK6cTNbh8sbC1YGX9MBnhRAFcsZEjMmrsDFnW/6M+zuTrAqPL0XEypwsInaBi53THRH08lfLfUoS4S00GjEilapN7HiHnLzrf2o=
Received: from DM2PR05MB623.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.141.157.24) by DM2PR05MB621.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.141.157.18) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.466.19; Thu, 21 Apr 2016 14:16:57 +0000
Received: from DM2PR05MB623.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([10.141.157.24]) by DM2PR05MB623.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([10.141.157.24]) with mapi id 15.01.0466.023; Thu, 21 Apr 2016 14:16:57 +0000
From: Chris Bowers <cbowers@juniper.net>
To: Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com>, "rtgwg@ietf.org" <rtgwg@ietf.org>
Subject: RE: WGLC on draft-ietf-rtgwg-rlfa-node-protection
Thread-Topic: WGLC on draft-ietf-rtgwg-rlfa-node-protection
Thread-Index: AQHRm6FTNpgJH/tQgE6wiUoQ3QAH+J+UeVGw
Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2016 14:16:57 +0000
Message-ID: <DM2PR05MB6238EE99EC61B9D94F3E78BA96E0@DM2PR05MB623.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
References: <896EBEE8-E1D5-461B-9AD0-044BFE20F846@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <896EBEE8-E1D5-461B-9AD0-044BFE20F846@gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: gmail.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;gmail.com; dmarc=none action=none header.from=juniper.net;
x-originating-ip: [66.129.239.15]
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 454bbb60-c6e2-41d1-c9bd-08d369ef98ec
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; DM2PR05MB621; 5:wdZbK+3R2hwVfoVurzQOr48izUDuJmOGQ3yhi9WxPYDFQej3EHK8PZT9zgeDU0OCEYr4tbSdCFdjA0A/8OInE89WCUkWZzJx+H5LYwS5dkRYUiRnVsM2JTpi9gy+Qccf3wFzavh0GFeMI1iLeXPY1NNJWFlcj5e8q/qS/c/GgdW3MtoM5tBPUXIZ/RTTemk4; 24:TsdmSyAnJZrbFWm/bRuK0Cj0D2IDtNXmEyHgR5n2IZoKNk84Ha1zHcKlaTiktYJ5mOX0584xQNiPqLV89Od3e247lr/r7FzcJ6wZFC4MNB4=; 7:A5cUvEbII5PhTHvr+sz9TBxtdWkGCRKkCFbPPvT8JpoeK6wo/uwt5xAIocwZbciVoruVb/281xEpsj6rAWWTEEhOn/CLcWgnVuSuNcbLIZo9P2Z9ugCZSKi4XoGS8G5sXXH39ZLG4DhulJMKCM1q9qq6LBth0OlmY4xRUWy/AyiBI504JDiHof/3SUrQLqASXCU0xJKgGXU7XLNEBgwwmd0taP7yU3cpUn/MndA/Hts=
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:DM2PR05MB621;
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <DM2PR05MB621A4FB8B57054B127601B0A96E0@DM2PR05MB621.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:;
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(9101521026)(601004)(2401047)(8121501046)(5005006)(10201501046)(3002001)(6055026); SRVR:DM2PR05MB621; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:DM2PR05MB621;
x-forefront-prvs: 091949432C
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(377454003)(1096002)(2501003)(1220700001)(5008740100001)(5002640100001)(2906002)(19617315012)(76576001)(122556002)(189998001)(6116002)(102836003)(790700001)(5001770100001)(586003)(3846002)(66066001)(230783001)(92566002)(11100500001)(4326007)(16236675004)(19609705001)(87936001)(19580405001)(19625215002)(3280700002)(9686002)(76176999)(74316001)(19300405004)(33656002)(10400500002)(3660700001)(54356999)(5004730100002)(99286002)(50986999)(19580395003)(86362001)(106116001)(77096005)(5003600100002)(15975445007)(2950100001)(81166005)(2900100001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:DM2PR05MB621; H:DM2PR05MB623.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; MLV:sfv; LANG:en;
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:23
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_DM2PR05MB6238EE99EC61B9D94F3E78BA96E0DM2PR05MB623namprd_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: juniper.net
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 21 Apr 2016 14:16:57.2189 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: bea78b3c-4cdb-4130-854a-1d193232e5f4
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: DM2PR05MB621
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtgwg/zmAGUPM92Vb5Zx26CqVHVRp11j8>
Cc: rtgwg-chairs <rtgwg-chairs@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Working Group <rtgwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtgwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2016 14:17:24 -0000

I am not aware of IPR other than those in the two disclosures below.

Chris

From: Jeff Tantsura [mailto:jefftant.ietf@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 21, 2016 2:42 AM
To: rtgwg@ietf.org
Cc: rtgwg-chairs <rtgwg-chairs@ietf.org>
Subject: WGLC on draft-ietf-rtgwg-rlfa-node-protection

Dear RTGWG,

The authors of draft-ietf-rtgwg-rlfa-node-protection have told us that the
draft is ready for working group last call (WGLC).

Before we do the WGLC we want to do an IPR poll on the document.

This mail starts that IPR poll.

Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft-ietf-rtgwg-rlfa-node-protection?

If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
(see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).

Currently there are two IPR disclosures on draft-psarkar-rtgwg-rlfa-node-protection
(which was the pre-working group version of draft-ietf-rtgwg-rlfa-node-protection):
https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/2334/
https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/2346/

If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond to
this email regardless of whether or not you are aware of any relevant
IPR. *The response needs to be sent to the MPLS wg mailing list.* The
document will not advance to the next stage until a response has been
received from each author and contributor.

If you are on the RTGWG email list but are not listed as an author or
contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of any
IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules.

Thanks,
Jeff and Chris

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email