RE: WGLC on draft-ietf-rtgwg-rlfa-node-protection

<stephane.litkowski@orange.com> Thu, 21 April 2016 15:29 UTC

Return-Path: <stephane.litkowski@orange.com>
X-Original-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 576E012E0C1; Thu, 21 Apr 2016 08:29:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.618
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.618 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DiesW96rq01k; Thu, 21 Apr 2016 08:29:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relais-inet.francetelecom.com (relais-ias91.francetelecom.com [193.251.215.91]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FBC612D577; Thu, 21 Apr 2016 08:29:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from omfedm05.si.francetelecom.fr (unknown [xx.xx.xx.1]) by omfedm13.si.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id DABC9324474; Thu, 21 Apr 2016 17:29:55 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from Exchangemail-eme2.itn.ftgroup (unknown [10.114.31.57]) by omfedm05.si.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id AF58B35C070; Thu, 21 Apr 2016 17:29:55 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from OPEXCLILMA4.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup ([fe80::65de:2f08:41e6:ebbe]) by OPEXCLILM23.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup ([fe80::787e:db0c:23c4:71b3%19]) with mapi id 14.03.0279.002; Thu, 21 Apr 2016 17:29:55 +0200
From: stephane.litkowski@orange.com
To: Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com>, "rtgwg@ietf.org" <rtgwg@ietf.org>
Subject: RE: WGLC on draft-ietf-rtgwg-rlfa-node-protection
Thread-Topic: WGLC on draft-ietf-rtgwg-rlfa-node-protection
Thread-Index: AQHRm6FURpWCoZkeoE+G3PUwKatw6p+UjgUw
Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2016 15:29:54 +0000
Message-ID: <7690_1461252595_5718F1F3_7690_10738_1_9E32478DFA9976438E7A22F69B08FF921BB0A830@OPEXCLILMA4.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
References: <896EBEE8-E1D5-461B-9AD0-044BFE20F846@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <896EBEE8-E1D5-461B-9AD0-044BFE20F846@gmail.com>
Accept-Language: fr-FR, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.168.234.3]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_9E32478DFA9976438E7A22F69B08FF921BB0A830OPEXCLILMA4corp_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-PMX-Version: 6.2.1.2478543, Antispam-Engine: 2.7.2.2107409, Antispam-Data: 2016.4.21.144517
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtgwg/Et3ce03AxYQgQ80GvIahnTELTf0>
Cc: rtgwg-chairs <rtgwg-chairs@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Working Group <rtgwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtgwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2016 15:29:59 -0000

I am not aware of IPR other than those in the two disclosures below.


From: rtgwg [mailto:rtgwg-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Jeff Tantsura
Sent: Thursday, April 21, 2016 09:42
To: rtgwg@ietf.org
Cc: rtgwg-chairs
Subject: WGLC on draft-ietf-rtgwg-rlfa-node-protection

Dear RTGWG,

The authors of draft-ietf-rtgwg-rlfa-node-protection have told us that the
draft is ready for working group last call (WGLC).

Before we do the WGLC we want to do an IPR poll on the document.

This mail starts that IPR poll.

Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft-ietf-rtgwg-rlfa-node-protection?

If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
(see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).

Currently there are two IPR disclosures on draft-psarkar-rtgwg-rlfa-node-protection
(which was the pre-working group version of draft-ietf-rtgwg-rlfa-node-protection):
https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/2334/
https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/2346/

If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond to
this email regardless of whether or not you are aware of any relevant
IPR. *The response needs to be sent to the MPLS wg mailing list.* The
document will not advance to the next stage until a response has been
received from each author and contributor.

If you are on the RTGWG email list but are not listed as an author or
contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of any
IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules.

Thanks,
Jeff and Chris

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.

This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law;
they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments.
As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified.
Thank you.