IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-key-chain: YANG compilation

Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com> Mon, 04 July 2016 06:29 UTC

Return-Path: <bclaise@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C67012D50C for <rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 3 Jul 2016 23:29:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -15.947
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.947 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.426, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cCUghzDxnGqn for <rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 3 Jul 2016 23:29:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aer-iport-3.cisco.com (aer-iport-3.cisco.com [173.38.203.53]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F0C4512B05C for <rtgwg@ietf.org>; Sun, 3 Jul 2016 23:29:45 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2864; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1467613786; x=1468823386; h=subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date: mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=5KPHtGDuX0Rn60X8K36qboO2rITA2yc7C2rlnoXMlsQ=; b=mMIoKBc+LPiYPOtNmltM8r/ntgeGP0WZXSZ0tZiQwX1pMzYZUaza9l5I 2SVqSfZh8Y1Yd/wDTCtN+KqzhtxNGELQ8+5HtriJj46DdOJ879nFjaHcl IRvjgCUH8zYNCUhy5D+V07G0ycEAHQUuMY/DGvOIFG7jse5hcqsxDMUDj E=;
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.26,573,1459814400"; d="scan'208";a="636531230"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-4.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 04 Jul 2016 06:29:44 +0000
Received: from [10.60.67.84] (ams-bclaise-8913.cisco.com [10.60.67.84]) by aer-core-4.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u646ThQ3021126; Mon, 4 Jul 2016 06:29:44 GMT
Subject: Re: draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-key-chain: YANG compilation
To: "Reshad Rahman (rrahman)" <rrahman@cisco.com>, "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>, "draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-key-chain@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-key-chain@tools.ietf.org>, "rtgwg@ietf.org" <rtgwg@ietf.org>
References: <0f35716a-f7fd-e0a7-079c-6ff128f19043@cisco.com> <916aea98-b4ad-e56a-2dd7-18826aec3f42@cisco.com> <D397DA40.670DE%acee@cisco.com> <D39F354C.17983A%rrahman@cisco.com> <D39F3740.67D96%acee@cisco.com> <D39F3996.179886%rrahman@cisco.com>
From: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <c44fcd90-a56e-79f1-3f1b-5c275f19a857@cisco.com>
Date: Mon, 04 Jul 2016 08:29:43 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.1.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <D39F3996.179886%rrahman@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtgwg/TdrF6S0J4SSkTRjuZ4zQwf1SyyA>
Cc: Xufeng Liu <xufeng.liu@ericsson.com>
X-BeenThere: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Working Group <rtgwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtgwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Jul 2016 06:29:48 -0000

Please report it as a bug
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-key-chain/
     => very last line of the page.

Regards, B.
> Thanks Acee. I was on
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-key-chain-03 and it
> showed 03 as latest. When I went to 02 it showed up to 06.
>
>
>
> On 2016-07-03, 9:43 PM, "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com> wrote:
>
>> Reshad - you are looking at an older version. Look at the latest,
>> https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-key-chain-06.txt
>> Acee
>>
>> On 7/3/16, 9:36 PM, "Reshad Rahman (rrahman)" <rrahman@cisco.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Is there still a small issue in draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-key-chain-03
>>>
>>> 4 Key Chain YANG Model
>>>
>>>    <CODE BEGINS> file "ietf-routing-key-chain@2016-06-27.yang"
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 2016-06-28, 7:42 AM, "rtgwg on behalf of Acee Lindem (acee)"
>>> <rtgwg-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of acee@cisco.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Derek, Stephane, and Xufeng,
>>>>
>>>> Due to popular demand, we have restored the name of the key-chain module
>>>> to simply ³ietf-key-chain². Please update references prior to the July
>>>> 8th
>>>> cut-off.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Acee
>>>>
>>>> On 6/28/16, 2:59 AM, "rtgwg on behalf of Benoit Claise (bclaise)"
>>>> <rtgwg-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of bclaise@cisco.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Also, note that 7 YANG modules currently fail because of this issue,
>>>>> while they compiled fine with v2.
>>>>>      ietf-bier.yang
>>>>>      ietf-isis-sr@2016-03-21.yang
>>>>>      ietf-isis@2016-03-21.yang
>>>>>      ietf-ospf-bfd@2016-03-20.yang
>>>>>      ietf-ospf-sr@2016-03-20.yang
>>>>>      ietf-ospf@2016-03-20.yang
>>>>>      ietf-rip@2016-01-28.yang
>>>>>
>>>>> Search for "ietf-routing-key-chain" in
>>>>> http://www.claise.be/IETFYANGPageCompilation.html
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards, Benoit
>>>>>> Dear draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-key-chain-03,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The YANG module compilation in your draft fails with the following
>>>>>> warning:
>>>>>> ietf-routing-key-chain@2016-06-27.yang:1: warning: unexpected
>>>>>> modulename "ietf-key-chain" in
>>>>>> ietf-routing-key-chain@2016-06-27.yang,
>>>>>> should be ietf-routing-key-chain
>>>>>> See http://www.claise.be/IETFYANGPageCompilation.html
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The previous version 02 was fine in that regards.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This warning should have been flagged in idnits. Let me know if this
>>>>>> was not the case.
>>>>>> www.yangvalidator.com can also be useful.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards, Benoit
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> rtgwg mailing list
>>>>> rtgwg@ietf.org
>>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> rtgwg mailing list
>>>> rtgwg@ietf.org
>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email