Re: draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-key-chain: YANG compilation

"Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com> Mon, 04 July 2016 01:44 UTC

Return-Path: <acee@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF8DB12D1B2 for <rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 3 Jul 2016 18:44:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -15.947
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.947 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.426, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nXpXrTphNmbe for <rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 3 Jul 2016 18:44:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-5.cisco.com (alln-iport-5.cisco.com [173.37.142.92]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 08B3812D0F1 for <rtgwg@ietf.org>; Sun, 3 Jul 2016 18:44:15 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=3158; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1467596656; x=1468806256; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=WRKGQKPFkr9uxC86aAYB6evKlsSelrhGJN5TZ1uMmdo=; b=kY2JcYFL6L/oP2uTwjuD1UMBB3/7m2bHzjH8QrWkTnES8ff8koY1CoYl aXGeQ6yDpbyiieyHlQEpx5Ahahrpc931H3QAXhk72MYRhGreZuHDHIVF8 hL8vGnxdhCj5t0lpRlUJua4x5On5BtJaf32o0kiYLEbGEnhS33Amg05iG A=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0AaAgA3v3lX/4oNJK1bgz5WfAa5LYF5IoV2AhyBDDgUAQEBAQEBAWUnhE0BBQEBIREVJQsQAgEIGAICJgICAiULFRACBAENBYgwDrIUjzUBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEcgQGJdIRAFyOCR4JaBY4Eiw8BjkaBaoRWiGqGV4kyAR42g3BuAYc0fwEBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.26,572,1459814400"; d="scan'208";a="291349957"
Received: from alln-core-5.cisco.com ([173.36.13.138]) by alln-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 04 Jul 2016 01:43:59 +0000
Received: from XCH-RTP-002.cisco.com (xch-rtp-002.cisco.com [64.101.220.142]) by alln-core-5.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u641hwRC020172 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Mon, 4 Jul 2016 01:43:59 GMT
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com (64.101.220.155) by XCH-RTP-002.cisco.com (64.101.220.142) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Sun, 3 Jul 2016 21:43:57 -0400
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) by XCH-RTP-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) with mapi id 15.00.1210.000; Sun, 3 Jul 2016 21:43:57 -0400
From: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
To: "Reshad Rahman (rrahman)" <rrahman@cisco.com>, "Benoit Claise (bclaise)" <bclaise@cisco.com>, "draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-key-chain@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-key-chain@tools.ietf.org>, "rtgwg@ietf.org" <rtgwg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-key-chain: YANG compilation
Thread-Topic: draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-key-chain: YANG compilation
Thread-Index: AQHR0QmYyvKcueWKj0qg1yviBa67KZ/+tjCAgAAL9oCACQfKAP//vwmA
Date: Mon, 04 Jul 2016 01:43:57 +0000
Message-ID: <D39F3740.67D96%acee@cisco.com>
References: <0f35716a-f7fd-e0a7-079c-6ff128f19043@cisco.com> <916aea98-b4ad-e56a-2dd7-18826aec3f42@cisco.com> <D397DA40.670DE%acee@cisco.com> <D39F354C.17983A%rrahman@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <D39F354C.17983A%rrahman@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.116.152.196]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <3DB6C8BE2E1EBF4486CDB255832139D6@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtgwg/vqj4-UBdjmAmjUDes_nNKP9fIMs>
Cc: Xufeng Liu <xufeng.liu@ericsson.com>
X-BeenThere: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Working Group <rtgwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtgwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Jul 2016 01:44:18 -0000

Reshad - you are looking at an older version. Look at the latest,
https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-key-chain-06.txt
Acee 

On 7/3/16, 9:36 PM, "Reshad Rahman (rrahman)" <rrahman@cisco.com> wrote:

>Is there still a small issue in draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-key-chain-03
>
>4 Key Chain YANG Model
>
>   <CODE BEGINS> file "ietf-routing-key-chain@2016-06-27.yang"
>
>
>
>
>
>On 2016-06-28, 7:42 AM, "rtgwg on behalf of Acee Lindem (acee)"
><rtgwg-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of acee@cisco.com> wrote:
>
>>Derek, Stephane, and Xufeng,
>>
>>Due to popular demand, we have restored the name of the key-chain module
>>to simply ³ietf-key-chain². Please update references prior to the July
>>8th
>>cut-off. 
>>
>>Thanks,
>>Acee 
>>
>>On 6/28/16, 2:59 AM, "rtgwg on behalf of Benoit Claise (bclaise)"
>><rtgwg-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of bclaise@cisco.com> wrote:
>>
>>>Also, note that 7 YANG modules currently fail because of this issue,
>>>while they compiled fine with v2.
>>>     ietf-bier.yang
>>>     ietf-isis-sr@2016-03-21.yang
>>>     ietf-isis@2016-03-21.yang
>>>     ietf-ospf-bfd@2016-03-20.yang
>>>     ietf-ospf-sr@2016-03-20.yang
>>>     ietf-ospf@2016-03-20.yang
>>>     ietf-rip@2016-01-28.yang
>>>
>>>Search for "ietf-routing-key-chain" in
>>>http://www.claise.be/IETFYANGPageCompilation.html
>>>
>>>Regards, Benoit
>>>> Dear draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-key-chain-03,
>>>>
>>>> The YANG module compilation in your draft fails with the following
>>>> warning:
>>>> ietf-routing-key-chain@2016-06-27.yang:1: warning: unexpected
>>>> modulename "ietf-key-chain" in ietf-routing-key-chain@2016-06-27.yang,
>>>> should be ietf-routing-key-chain
>>>> See http://www.claise.be/IETFYANGPageCompilation.html
>>>>
>>>> The previous version 02 was fine in that regards.
>>>>
>>>> This warning should have been flagged in idnits. Let me know if this
>>>> was not the case.
>>>> www.yangvalidator.com can also be useful.
>>>>
>>>> Regards, Benoit
>>>
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>rtgwg mailing list
>>>rtgwg@ietf.org
>>>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>rtgwg mailing list
>>rtgwg@ietf.org
>>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
>