Re: draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-key-chain: YANG compilation

"Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com> Tue, 28 June 2016 11:42 UTC

Return-Path: <acee@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 904F012DE18 for <rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Jun 2016 04:42:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -15.947
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.947 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.426, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mv4KJLMUjtO0 for <rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Jun 2016 04:42:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com [173.37.86.75]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BD94812DE0D for <rtgwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Jun 2016 04:42:17 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2106; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1467114137; x=1468323737; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=t1cM+vEKquaGCNHMr07IWfugeAu2j9tQewcWpD9XNjQ=; b=RVREXbfk04xBMOfQak8y4kNTJwdDPw8gVQ5z59qdvfrK/7wbNSzcyKwK bVUDah74zHmbfvdz6DxpTDPRhhZQZGqQMyGMNlyfJt2jsX3XDIE0PZUaN aE3PD0kzb15u4JNczvXPwszeJgEnI2MxNpPmZ/g7i5hbE8ghUUq9CfQeg Y=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0AWAgDfYXJX/5BdJa1bgz5WfQa6KoF7FwuFdgIcgRs4FAEBAQEBAQFlJ4RNAQEEAQEBIBEVJQsQAgEIGgImAgICJQsVEAIEAQ0FiDAOsXGQKwEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBARyBAYl0hECDAYJaBY17iwcBjjmBaYRUiGeGVIkqAR42g3BuAYgwfwEBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.26,541,1459814400"; d="scan'208";a="119818585"
Received: from rcdn-core-8.cisco.com ([173.37.93.144]) by rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 28 Jun 2016 11:42:16 +0000
Received: from XCH-RTP-008.cisco.com (xch-rtp-008.cisco.com [64.101.220.148]) by rcdn-core-8.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u5SBgGQi031963 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 28 Jun 2016 11:42:16 GMT
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com (64.101.220.155) by XCH-RTP-008.cisco.com (64.101.220.148) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Tue, 28 Jun 2016 07:42:16 -0400
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) by XCH-RTP-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) with mapi id 15.00.1210.000; Tue, 28 Jun 2016 07:42:16 -0400
From: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
To: "Benoit Claise (bclaise)" <bclaise@cisco.com>, "draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-key-chain@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-key-chain@tools.ietf.org>, "rtgwg@ietf.org" <rtgwg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-key-chain: YANG compilation
Thread-Topic: draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-key-chain: YANG compilation
Thread-Index: AQHR0QmYyvKcueWKj0qg1yviBa67KZ/+tjCAgAAL9oA=
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2016 11:42:15 +0000
Message-ID: <D397DA40.670DE%acee@cisco.com>
References: <0f35716a-f7fd-e0a7-079c-6ff128f19043@cisco.com> <916aea98-b4ad-e56a-2dd7-18826aec3f42@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <916aea98-b4ad-e56a-2dd7-18826aec3f42@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.116.152.196]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <D3E8A4376ABF3844A55F31861DA2F2AB@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtgwg/bAHgRhhf52bGK-K5ZtBcoyNeEkU>
Cc: Xufeng Liu <xufeng.liu@ericsson.com>
X-BeenThere: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Working Group <rtgwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtgwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2016 11:42:19 -0000

Derek, Stephane, and Xufeng,

Due to popular demand, we have restored the name of the key-chain module
to simply “ietf-key-chain”. Please update references prior to the July 8th
cut-off. 

Thanks,
Acee 

On 6/28/16, 2:59 AM, "rtgwg on behalf of Benoit Claise (bclaise)"
<rtgwg-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of bclaise@cisco.com> wrote:

>Also, note that 7 YANG modules currently fail because of this issue,
>while they compiled fine with v2.
>     ietf-bier.yang
>     ietf-isis-sr@2016-03-21.yang
>     ietf-isis@2016-03-21.yang
>     ietf-ospf-bfd@2016-03-20.yang
>     ietf-ospf-sr@2016-03-20.yang
>     ietf-ospf@2016-03-20.yang
>     ietf-rip@2016-01-28.yang
>
>Search for "ietf-routing-key-chain" in
>http://www.claise.be/IETFYANGPageCompilation.html
>
>Regards, Benoit
>> Dear draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-key-chain-03,
>>
>> The YANG module compilation in your draft fails with the following
>> warning:
>> ietf-routing-key-chain@2016-06-27.yang:1: warning: unexpected
>> modulename "ietf-key-chain" in ietf-routing-key-chain@2016-06-27.yang,
>> should be ietf-routing-key-chain
>> See http://www.claise.be/IETFYANGPageCompilation.html
>>
>> The previous version 02 was fine in that regards.
>>
>> This warning should have been flagged in idnits. Let me know if this
>> was not the case.
>> www.yangvalidator.com can also be useful.
>>
>> Regards, Benoit
>
>_______________________________________________
>rtgwg mailing list
>rtgwg@ietf.org
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg