IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: FW: WG last call for draft-ietf-rtgwg-uloop-delay

Clarence Filsfils <cfilsfil@cisco.com> Tue, 27 June 2017 17:18 UTC

Return-Path: <cfilsfil@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7C3C126CC7 for <rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 27 Jun 2017 10:18:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.502
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.502 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id f2svTjBlCbgI for <rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 27 Jun 2017 10:18:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aer-iport-4.cisco.com (aer-iport-4.cisco.com [173.38.203.54]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AD7DC12EA7C for <rtgwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 27 Jun 2017 10:18:11 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1840; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1498583891; x=1499793491; h=subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date: mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=jd6npDjYrqPS6RSQPptV/mZNX+jON8BQSa5o1qlcNbI=; b=RYoqbEohSBGaZiRN1xjiRZ6jG3rBUI/vbP6/89iTTvul2SSpqN4sIufh 9YU/63RF13YxGm0pNiz82IIEIYmhl07Z1c2tOJejEjT00DhD5Kp7W+9jd P+qHiUNEo0uccfvBQFg5xcAArg1/THehNWoWE1kQrN297PGDU2T7upBdj Q=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0AmAQDekVJZ/xbLJq1cGgEBAQECAQEBAQgBAQEBhDuBDo4Fc5BRIpV9ghEshX0Cgz4YAQIBAQEBAQEBayiFGAEBAQEDHRUBBTYGBRALDgMEAQEoB0YIAQgGDQYCAQGKHw0QsnCLVwEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBARgFgyeDTIIMC4JuhDsSAYYQAQSeb4c2jDWCCoVJg0uGdoxViE8fOH8LUSMVSYcVPjaGbIIwAQEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.39,402,1493683200"; d="scan'208";a="655714947"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-4.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 27 Jun 2017 17:18:09 +0000
Received: from [10.61.68.72] (ams3-vpn-dhcp1096.cisco.com [10.61.68.72]) by aer-core-4.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v5RHI9Aa010627; Tue, 27 Jun 2017 17:18:09 GMT
Subject: Re: FW: WG last call for draft-ietf-rtgwg-uloop-delay
To: Chris Bowers <cbowers@juniper.net>
References: <MWHPR05MB282917F8DED2E45AA4CD3694A9C50@MWHPR05MB2829.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <MWHPR05MB282976C65D7C4A5B1DFB4B56A9DC0@MWHPR05MB2829.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
Cc: "stephane.litkowski@orange.com" <stephane.litkowski@orange.com>, rtgwg@ietf.org
From: Clarence Filsfils <cfilsfil@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <d034a072-0d3a-b854-7608-cd0caad4fe5d@cisco.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2017 19:18:09 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.7.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <MWHPR05MB282976C65D7C4A5B1DFB4B56A9DC0@MWHPR05MB2829.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtgwg/XbFs4-OhFjc4iBMs79O8rwUPIl4>
X-BeenThere: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Working Group <rtgwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtgwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2017 17:18:14 -0000

I’m not aware of any IPR.

Cheers,
Clarence


> *From:*rtgwg [mailto:rtgwg-bounces@ietf.org] *On Behalf Of *Chris Bowers
> *Sent:* Tuesday, June 20, 2017 12:26 PM
> *To:* RTGWG <rtgwg@ietf.org>
> *Cc:* draft-ietf-rtgwg-uloop-delay@ietf.org
> *Subject:* RE: WG last call for draft-ietf-rtgwg-uloop-delay
>
>
>
> RTGWG,
>
>
>
> The consensus appears to be for the WG to request publication of this
> draft as a standards track document.
>
>
>
> We still need IPR responses from two of the authors before we can proceed.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Chris and Jeff
>
>
>
> _____________________________________________
> *From:* Chris Bowers
> *Sent:* Friday, June 2, 2017 3:43 PM
> *To:* RTGWG <rtgwg@ietf.org <mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>>
> *Subject:* WG last call for draft-ietf-rtgwg-uloop-delay
>
>
>
>
>
> RTGWG,
>
>
>
> This email starts the two week WG last call for
> draft-ietf-rtgwg-uloop-delay.
>
>
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rtgwg-uloop-delay/
>
>
>
> Please indicate support for or opposition to the publication of this
>
> standards track document, along with the reasoning for that support or
>
> opposition.
>
>
>
> IPR:
>
> If you are listed as a document author or contributor, please respond to
>
> this email stating whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR. The
>
> response needs to be sent to the RTGWG mailing list. The document will
>
> not advance to the next stage until a response has been received from
>
> each author and each individual that has contributed to the document.
>
>
>
> The document currently has the following IPR disclosure associated
>
> with it.
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/2565/
>
>
>
> This last call will end on Friday June 16th.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Chris and Jeff
>
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email