IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: WG last call for draft-ietf-rtgwg-uloop-delay

"Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com> Sat, 03 June 2017 23:04 UTC

Return-Path: <acee@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE1F7120725 for <rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 3 Jun 2017 16:04:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.521
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.521 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id E5o6G_NocMae for <rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 3 Jun 2017 16:04:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-6.cisco.com (alln-iport-6.cisco.com [173.37.142.93]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0CC261201FA for <rtgwg@ietf.org>; Sat, 3 Jun 2017 16:04:37 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=6731; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1496531076; x=1497740676; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: mime-version; bh=KlHxRYdlI188i3TCWc0PXH8kyfYqxyWPypAipZeruEQ=; b=kxUDoRf2WlTNXQlBwDCvUP8Pt1P1f7PbblpmCuedhFtYw1XtM7XaA7V0 HOQI9nbOqHYGoEEtHCu6CmT7lryynFO9vmRzNr0xX7vUNbKmzvkCLF91E DbhHP2IIgKTEhRotIBxBYD2dkRPnbS2OjgfWSPFnMEQCSp9AT0Gmqvp8a U=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0DxAAALQDNZ/4UNJK1cGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBBwEBAQEBgm9pYoENB4NsY4k2kgCQRYU4ghAshXgCGoJiPxgBAgEBAQEBAQFrKIUYAQEBAQMdBgpBBhUCAQgOAwMBAigDAgICMBQJCAEBBAESiUZkEK1DgiaLCQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBGQWLYIQ7EgE8gnKCYQWXAYcyAYchjAuCBoU+ijiUXgEfOH8LdBVGhwZ2hz6BI4ENAQEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.39,292,1493683200"; d="scan'208,217";a="435435897"
Received: from alln-core-11.cisco.com ([173.36.13.133]) by alln-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 03 Jun 2017 23:04:36 +0000
Received: from XCH-RTP-013.cisco.com (xch-rtp-013.cisco.com [64.101.220.153]) by alln-core-11.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v53N4ZuL031601 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Sat, 3 Jun 2017 23:04:36 GMT
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com (64.101.220.155) by XCH-RTP-013.cisco.com (64.101.220.153) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Sat, 3 Jun 2017 19:04:35 -0400
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) by XCH-RTP-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) with mapi id 15.00.1210.000; Sat, 3 Jun 2017 19:04:35 -0400
From: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
To: Chris Bowers <cbowers@juniper.net>, RTGWG <rtgwg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: WG last call for draft-ietf-rtgwg-uloop-delay
Thread-Topic: WG last call for draft-ietf-rtgwg-uloop-delay
Thread-Index: AdLb3vVB+stvjRstQSySgkSfkwvpZAA3sw0A
Date: Sat, 03 Jun 2017 23:04:35 +0000
Message-ID: <D558B7A5.B2045%acee@cisco.com>
References: <MWHPR05MB2829DC391A9101895C1D297FA9F70@MWHPR05MB2829.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <MWHPR05MB2829DC391A9101895C1D297FA9F70@MWHPR05MB2829.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.116.152.196]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_D558B7A5B2045aceeciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtgwg/pDRNXtyNGARMKMFnGooXJSRovR4>
X-BeenThere: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Working Group <rtgwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtgwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 03 Jun 2017 23:04:39 -0000

I support advancement and publication of this draft.  I think we should have the discussion of whether or not it should be standards track, BCP, or informational as invariably this question will arise during all the reviews.
Thanks,
Acee

From: rtgwg <rtgwg-bounces@ietf.org<mailto:rtgwg-bounces@ietf.org>> on behalf of Chris Bowers <cbowers@juniper.net<mailto:cbowers@juniper.net>>
Date: Friday, June 2, 2017 at 4:43 PM
To: Routing WG <rtgwg@ietf.org<mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>>
Subject: WG last call for draft-ietf-rtgwg-uloop-delay

RTGWG,

This email starts the two week WG last call for draft-ietf-rtgwg-uloop-delay.

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rtgwg-uloop-delay/

Please indicate support for or opposition to the publication of this
standards track document, along with the reasoning for that support or
opposition.

IPR:
If you are listed as a document author or contributor, please respond to
this email stating whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR. The
response needs to be sent to the RTGWG mailing list. The document will
not advance to the next stage until a response has been received from
each author and each individual that has contributed to the document.

The document currently has the following IPR disclosure associated
with it.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/2565/

This last call will end on Friday June 16th.

Thanks,
Chris and Jeff

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email