Re: WG last call for draft-ietf-rtgwg-uloop-delay
Pierre Francois <pfrpfr@gmail.com> Wed, 21 June 2017 15:49 UTC
Return-Path: <pfrpfr@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69888129C2F for <rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 Jun 2017 08:49:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.996
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.996 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HK_RANDOM_ENVFROM=0.001, HK_RANDOM_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kKE_M0Dx1ISt for <rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 Jun 2017 08:49:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wr0-x22e.google.com (mail-wr0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c0c::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CCB6A12EB13 for <rtgwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 21 Jun 2017 08:47:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wr0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id y25so101138365wrd.2 for <rtgwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 21 Jun 2017 08:47:58 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=3p5AWwpH8H1UCd0QhRurZvop9Fu/Y5YKDCTfCtpI0Ss=; b=fPqskHXS7nLiw4hOaEJkr1DU6+DRtdjN9Ak15JVaMKi+ZbIy6l4thytHBeXHNK83z9 pm/LAFbu1D0M1jLY4JcLCLnWrW32B6NdKe78dmLs7E8g5fcYzD6XN2jkYRnnAqwecy/6 oM67GUc/uNPg6PY1k6PysuNug3DVgoid6xx8R7NaGV4hUxDvvrT92DFHFdVS8IpLgs+K QrFlQMSuvKBS1uN9Eq7c+g66sNh4BvDQszMwJlSzuBGWzPmPtUwr1mRS+AMJLV5AiiNW ge5FcOofaTAUAVSLfSrMq9ndkInEjy5Knhk4lLOkssDw77j7SuRXyR+TK18Dbpo6gur+ ep7A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=3p5AWwpH8H1UCd0QhRurZvop9Fu/Y5YKDCTfCtpI0Ss=; b=Hk6h2rHkHWWCB0Y1M2QiFbRo0mafuzJShMlQlsJOEQ2eRa4DpagIm3kPtGpVFK6ibw kO4oIXso7XgXfXmPYcjIeV3mWYHlgmYEhdv0Pj0hzPGZgvlBthI8TAVD1F3ZVCtApM8n RLALxHUQz/1ukhH7M5k2pU1ZHsXg9zF5hx973IMvv+2ypUOKsysYR/+39pCshakBmDU8 gVZamvSOYEj893bdtBEYhphchL7C28MMWPjLL7xyRbDBYD6eBG/kVSag6oCNJA2hdHCk GrYFNWJ4gSV/eGVtCOx1gsrClF/OKZtDuY6ZwQlr1TAJC7PVWM9zNxiFN/GVIAQ/eVHj vZDA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKS2vOxTx3RthjoK4GsU9+ZOvco1q/JwXurlYWYeeuuqa330LmACXUBm UCLdNmF5Ti1WTuIzp7Y=
X-Received: by 10.28.228.84 with SMTP id b81mr7263841wmh.78.1498060077175; Wed, 21 Jun 2017 08:47:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [172.16.1.92] (LStLambert-657-1-75-194.w80-13.abo.wanadoo.fr. [80.13.56.194]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id x71sm29090605wmd.32.2017.06.21.08.47.56 (version=TLS1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 21 Jun 2017 08:47:56 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail-FFB93B44-7A9D-4EBF-9925-F6CF587AA942"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Subject: Re: WG last call for draft-ietf-rtgwg-uloop-delay
From: Pierre Francois <pfrpfr@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (13G36)
In-Reply-To: <MWHPR05MB2829C8F185704FB71AB77D2CA9DA0@MWHPR05MB2829.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2017 17:47:55 +0200
Cc: rtgwg@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <F91861C9-E2D4-4001-9D4A-2841A2B1E51B@gmail.com>
References: <MWHPR05MB2829C8F185704FB71AB77D2CA9DA0@MWHPR05MB2829.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
To: Chris Bowers <cbowers@juniper.net>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtgwg/yogkoicK54cJlFxraV5cDssrnYs>
X-BeenThere: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Working Group <rtgwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtgwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2017 15:49:22 -0000
Hello Chris, I am not aware of IPR related to this document. Regards, Pierre. > On Jun 21, 2017, at 5:05 PM, Chris Bowers <cbowers@juniper.net> wrote: > > > > _____________________________________________ > From: Chris Bowers > Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2017 12:26 PM > To: 'RTGWG' <rtgwg@ietf.org> > Cc: 'draft-ietf-rtgwg-uloop-delay@ietf.org' <draft-ietf-rtgwg-uloop-delay@ietf.org> > Subject: RE: WG last call for draft-ietf-rtgwg-uloop-delay > > > RTGWG, > > The consensus appears to be for the WG to request publication of this draft as a standards track document. > > We still need IPR responses from two of the authors before we can proceed. > > Thanks, > Chris and Jeff > > _____________________________________________ > From: Chris Bowers > Sent: Friday, June 2, 2017 3:43 PM > To: RTGWG <rtgwg@ietf.org> > Subject: WG last call for draft-ietf-rtgwg-uloop-delay > > > RTGWG, > > This email starts the two week WG last call for draft-ietf-rtgwg-uloop-delay. > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rtgwg-uloop-delay/ > > Please indicate support for or opposition to the publication of this > standards track document, along with the reasoning for that support or > opposition. > > IPR: > If you are listed as a document author or contributor, please respond to > this email stating whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR. The > response needs to be sent to the RTGWG mailing list. The document will > not advance to the next stage until a response has been received from > each author and each individual that has contributed to the document. > > The document currently has the following IPR disclosure associated > with it. > https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/2565/ > > This last call will end on Friday June 16th. > > Thanks, > Chris and Jeff >
- WG last call for draft-ietf-rtgwg-uloop-delay Chris Bowers
- Re: WG last call for draft-ietf-rtgwg-uloop-delay Acee Lindem (acee)
- RE: WG last call for draft-ietf-rtgwg-uloop-delay Chris Bowers
- Re: WG last call for draft-ietf-rtgwg-uloop-delay Stewart Bryant
- Re: WG last call for draft-ietf-rtgwg-uloop-delay Stewart Bryant
- RE: WG last call for draft-ietf-rtgwg-uloop-delay Chris Bowers
- Re: WG last call for draft-ietf-rtgwg-uloop-delay Stewart Bryant
- RE: WG last call for draft-ietf-rtgwg-uloop-delay stephane.litkowski
- RE: WG last call for draft-ietf-rtgwg-uloop-delay bruno.decraene
- RE: WG last call for draft-ietf-rtgwg-uloop-delay bruno.decraene
- RE: WG last call for draft-ietf-rtgwg-uloop-delay bruno.decraene
- Re: WG last call for draft-ietf-rtgwg-uloop-delay Acee Lindem (acee)
- RE: WG last call for draft-ietf-rtgwg-uloop-delay stephane.litkowski
- RE: WG last call for draft-ietf-rtgwg-uloop-delay Chris Bowers
- Re: WG last call for draft-ietf-rtgwg-uloop-delay Pierre Francois
- Re: FW: WG last call for draft-ietf-rtgwg-uloop-d… Clarence Filsfils