IETF Logo Mail Archive

IPR Claims related to draft-ietf-rtgwg-cl-use-cases

"Alvaro Retana (aretana)" <aretana@cisco.com> Fri, 14 February 2014 16:21 UTC

Return-Path: <aretana@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 131FE1A0214 for <rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 08:21:48 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -15.048
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.048 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.548, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jU-h5imQLqZ6 for <rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 08:21:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com [173.37.86.79]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B1B01A02C0 for <rtgwg@ietf.org>; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 08:21:46 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2057; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1392394905; x=1393604505; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=LRj5qprQ63DDaad2gIlOq6MkLNwx8Ry8fKw1KRg31TA=; b=ldTjUbOpG0Aw/XB31cMRLIy6vpoWAUN82Fo9WYKw1/RtXCw9IsHZMvaI gCLbZK1cMvmNHxaQKAsFh7P3XLYXEBTeDe9gnARtqDB8mE1gvWnc1ilZ+ JobTd/V+yRHsigOxIT9LA2r8r5p4AItN58e3UOlAIqnfbqQJODdamWggy c=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AjUFAG1C/lKtJV2b/2dsb2JhbABZgkJEgQ+/MoEUFnSCHBB5EgELAXQnBA6ICsghF455hD8EmCySI4Mtgio
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="4.95,845,1384300800"; d="scan'208,217"; a="304143256"
Received: from rcdn-core-4.cisco.com ([173.37.93.155]) by rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com with ESMTP; 14 Feb 2014 16:21:36 +0000
Received: from xhc-rcd-x05.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x05.cisco.com [173.37.183.79]) by rcdn-core-4.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s1EGLadh021694 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Fri, 14 Feb 2014 16:21:36 GMT
Received: from xmb-aln-x15.cisco.com ([169.254.9.30]) by xhc-rcd-x05.cisco.com ([173.37.183.79]) with mapi id 14.03.0123.003; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 10:21:36 -0600
From: "Alvaro Retana (aretana)" <aretana@cisco.com>
To: "draft-ietf-rtgwg-cl-use-cases@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-rtgwg-cl-use-cases@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: IPR Claims related to draft-ietf-rtgwg-cl-use-cases
Thread-Topic: IPR Claims related to draft-ietf-rtgwg-cl-use-cases
Thread-Index: AQHPKaDU96gsHYS+wk6jkB/ra0Mr1A==
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 16:21:36 +0000
Message-ID: <CF23ACBE.4BD2D%aretana@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.117.15.3]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_CF23ACBE4BD2Daretanaciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtgwg/ZsI4aeVo8xo0N7FOz5ZcHtVue0I
Cc: "rtgwg@ietf.org" <rtgwg@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Working Group <rtgwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtgwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 16:21:48 -0000

Hi!

In parallel to the WGLC for this draft, I want to formally ask the authors (no additional contributors are listed in the latest version of the draft) to please respond to this message indicating whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR.  The draft will not progress (pending the result of the WGLC) until we have received a response from each author.

We had asked a similar question back in May/2013 and some of the authors replied then (all indicating they were not aware of any IPR).  However, for completeness, we will require all the authors to reply again.

Thanks!

Alvaro.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email