IETF Logo Mail Archive

RE: IPR Claims related to draft-ietf-rtgwg-cl-use-cases

Lucy yong <lucy.yong@huawei.com> Fri, 07 March 2014 09:19 UTC

Return-Path: <lucy.yong@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 016871A01AE for <rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Mar 2014 01:19:46 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.747
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.747 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.547, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IGH-yKx9D0Sg for <rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Mar 2014 01:19:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A218C1A0253 for <rtgwg@ietf.org>; Fri, 7 Mar 2014 01:19:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml203-edg.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id BEI17722; Fri, 07 Mar 2014 09:19:34 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from LHREML403-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.217) by lhreml203-edg.huawei.com (172.18.7.221) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Fri, 7 Mar 2014 09:18:57 +0000
Received: from DFWEML706-CHM.china.huawei.com (10.193.5.225) by lhreml403-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.217) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Fri, 7 Mar 2014 09:19:34 +0000
Received: from DFWEML701-CHM.china.huawei.com ([169.254.1.118]) by dfweml706-chm.china.huawei.com ([169.254.8.30]) with mapi id 14.03.0158.001; Fri, 7 Mar 2014 01:19:23 -0800
From: Lucy yong <lucy.yong@huawei.com>
To: "Mcdysan, David E" <dave.mcdysan@verizon.com>, "rtgwg@ietf.org" <rtgwg@ietf.org>
Subject: RE: IPR Claims related to draft-ietf-rtgwg-cl-use-cases
Thread-Topic: IPR Claims related to draft-ietf-rtgwg-cl-use-cases
Thread-Index: AQHPKaDU96gsHYS+wk6jkB/ra0Mr1JrV8uUA//+G++A=
Date: Fri, 07 Mar 2014 09:19:22 +0000
Message-ID: <2691CE0099834E4A9C5044EEC662BB9D45352A53@dfweml701-chm.china.huawei.com>
References: <CF23ACBE.4BD2D%aretana@cisco.com> <CF3EEE94.83A92%dave.mcdysan@one.verizon.com>
In-Reply-To: <CF3EEE94.83A92%dave.mcdysan@one.verizon.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.47.69.222]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_2691CE0099834E4A9C5044EEC662BB9D45352A53dfweml701chmchi_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtgwg/yzHGZ_tGQR-2PH3PjjFv6eGWCNo
X-BeenThere: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Working Group <rtgwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtgwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Mar 2014 09:19:46 -0000

I am not aware of any IPR claims for this draft.

Lucy

From: "Alvaro Retana (aretana)" <aretana@cisco.com<mailto:aretana@cisco.com>>
Date: Friday, February 14, 2014 11:21 AM
To: "draft-ietf-rtgwg-cl-use-cases@tools.ietf.org<mailto:draft-ietf-rtgwg-cl-use-cases@tools.ietf.org>" <draft-ietf-rtgwg-cl-use-cases@tools.ietf.org<mailto:draft-ietf-rtgwg-cl-use-cases@tools.ietf.org>>
Cc: "rtgwg@ietf.org<mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>" <rtgwg@ietf.org<mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>>
Subject: IPR Claims related to draft-ietf-rtgwg-cl-use-cases

Hi!

In parallel to the WGLC for this draft, I want to formally ask the authors (no additional contributors are listed in the latest version of the draft) to please respond to this message indicating whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR.  The draft will not progress (pending the result of the WGLC) until we have received a response from each author.

We had asked a similar question back in May/2013 and some of the authors replied then (all indicating they were not aware of any IPR).  However, for completeness, we will require all the authors to reply again.

Thanks!

Alvaro.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email