Re: IPR Claims related to draft-ietf-rtgwg-cl-use-cases

"Mcdysan, David E" <dave.mcdysan@verizon.com> Fri, 07 March 2014 08:34 UTC

Return-Path: <dave.mcdysan@verizon.com>
X-Original-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 091221A0107 for <rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Mar 2014 00:34:27 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fd-ehHcCNXEC for <rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Mar 2014 00:34:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from omzsmtpe02.verizonbusiness.com (omzsmtpe02.verizonbusiness.com [199.249.25.209]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 588DC1A0103 for <rtgwg@ietf.org>; Fri, 7 Mar 2014 00:34:25 -0800 (PST)
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: false
Received: from unknown (HELO fldsmtpi03.verizon.com) ([166.68.71.145]) by omzsmtpe02.verizonbusiness.com with ESMTP; 07 Mar 2014 08:34:20 +0000
From: "Mcdysan, David E" <dave.mcdysan@verizon.com>
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="4.97,606,1389744000"; d="scan'208,217"; a="669497238"
Received: from fhdp1lumxc7hb03.verizon.com (HELO FHDP1LUMXC7HB03.us.one.verizon.com) ([166.68.59.190]) by fldsmtpi03.verizon.com with ESMTP; 07 Mar 2014 08:34:20 +0000
Received: from fhdp1lumxc7v11.us.one.verizon.com ([166.68.59.148]) by FHDP1LUMXC7HB03.us.one.verizon.com ([166.68.59.190]) with mapi; Fri, 7 Mar 2014 03:34:20 -0500
To: "rtgwg@ietf.org" <rtgwg@ietf.org>
Date: Fri, 07 Mar 2014 03:34:14 -0500
Subject: Re: IPR Claims related to draft-ietf-rtgwg-cl-use-cases
Thread-Topic: IPR Claims related to draft-ietf-rtgwg-cl-use-cases
Thread-Index: Ac854AihCg1U9vQeQa6JZ5P3tA8kkQ==
Message-ID: <CF3EEE94.83A92%dave.mcdysan@one.verizon.com>
References: <CF23ACBE.4BD2D%aretana@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <CF23ACBE.4BD2D%aretana@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.3.9.131030
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_CF3EEE9483A92davemcdysanoneverizoncom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtgwg/l53Q2W_qk3XD5JfTpCUFjlWt-BM
X-BeenThere: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Working Group <rtgwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtgwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Mar 2014 08:34:27 -0000

I am not aware of any IPR claims for this draft.

Dave

From: "Alvaro Retana (aretana)" <aretana@cisco.com<mailto:aretana@cisco.com>>
Date: Friday, February 14, 2014 11:21 AM
To: "draft-ietf-rtgwg-cl-use-cases@tools.ietf.org<mailto:draft-ietf-rtgwg-cl-use-cases@tools.ietf.org>" <draft-ietf-rtgwg-cl-use-cases@tools.ietf.org<mailto:draft-ietf-rtgwg-cl-use-cases@tools.ietf.org>>
Cc: "rtgwg@ietf.org<mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>" <rtgwg@ietf.org<mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>>
Subject: IPR Claims related to draft-ietf-rtgwg-cl-use-cases

Hi!

In parallel to the WGLC for this draft, I want to formally ask the authors (no additional contributors are listed in the latest version of the draft) to please respond to this message indicating whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR.  The draft will not progress (pending the result of the WGLC) until we have received a response from each author.

We had asked a similar question back in May/2013 and some of the authors replied then (all indicating they were not aware of any IPR).  However, for completeness, we will require all the authors to reply again.

Thanks!

Alvaro.