IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: RTGWG IPR poll draft-ietf-rtgwg-routing-types

"Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com> Tue, 13 June 2017 14:27 UTC

Return-Path: <acee@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E7B61318BB; Tue, 13 Jun 2017 07:27:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.523
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.523 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Qv9FzT3A_m7I; Tue, 13 Jun 2017 07:27:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com [173.37.86.73]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C3E0813188C; Tue, 13 Jun 2017 07:26:50 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1656; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1497364010; x=1498573610; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=ayYAVbZgZGks6sPayOogvPIp42a0Q9BzwUhoHzrnBYw=; b=EIZTMIctoqMg2/r1X2ly7/RJGVotV/Au4GMFX7b/lBAOWPxljC4FIj6d zJ/3OG/M+tv6GYOGFBhIGQGln401hRUNvfGJHOWJfl0qdPqYdbIZOvw7C i65uZlqtQB8oqn4MLOFvju/nwK8vp0BJ3lidFZOZ45wII/k2wRCFND7BY U=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0AGAQCm9T9Z/5ldJa1cGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBBwEBAQEBg1iBbweDbYoYmhyNWYIRhiQCGoIoPxgBAgEBAQEBAQFrKIUZBiMROgYFEAIBCBoCJgICAh8RFRACBAENBYoUAxWuKIImhzQNg3oBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAR6BC4c2gyCCWIFjEgEcF4J7gmEBBJ4IOwKOaYRkggeFQ4o+i0yJJwEfOH8LdBVIhw52hzmBI4ENAQEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.39,338,1493683200"; d="scan'208";a="260246490"
Received: from rcdn-core-2.cisco.com ([173.37.93.153]) by rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 13 Jun 2017 14:26:49 +0000
Received: from XCH-RTP-011.cisco.com (xch-rtp-011.cisco.com [64.101.220.151]) by rcdn-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v5DEQnc9021571 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 13 Jun 2017 14:26:49 GMT
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com (64.101.220.155) by XCH-RTP-011.cisco.com (64.101.220.151) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Tue, 13 Jun 2017 10:26:49 -0400
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) by XCH-RTP-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) with mapi id 15.00.1210.000; Tue, 13 Jun 2017 10:26:48 -0400
From: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
To: Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com>, RTGWG <rtgwg@ietf.org>
CC: rtgwg-chairs <rtgwg-chairs@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-rtgwg-routing-types@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-rtgwg-routing-types@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: RTGWG IPR poll draft-ietf-rtgwg-routing-types
Thread-Topic: RTGWG IPR poll draft-ietf-rtgwg-routing-types
Thread-Index: AQHS5FEX0/g5VGi1PUmC9mYY+hc25A==
Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2017 14:26:48 +0000
Message-ID: <D5656E53.B2DB2%acee@cisco.com>
References: <61F864E7-3262-4371-B09E-6A3DD06B7BB8@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <61F864E7-3262-4371-B09E-6A3DD06B7BB8@gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.116.152.196]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <B6A57145E97E6B418BF3859FC8BE2631@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtgwg/bw09QoD6nsR93Zy2jGnBl8OX_PQ>
X-BeenThere: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Working Group <rtgwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtgwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2017 14:27:49 -0000

I am not aware of any IPR relating to this draft.
Thanks,
Acee 

On 6/13/17, 5:36 AM, "Jeff Tantsura" <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:

>Dear RTGWG,
> 
>The authors of draft-ietf-rtgwg-routing-types believe that the
>draft is ready for working group last call (WGLC).
> 
>Before we do the WGLC we want to do the IPR poll on the draft.
> 
>This email is to start the IPR poll.
> 
>Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft-ietf-rtgwg-routing-types?
> 
>If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
>(see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).
> 
>
>If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond to
>this email regardless of whether or not you are aware of any relevant
>IPR. *The response needs to be sent to the RTGWG mailing list.* The
>document will not advance to the next stage until a response has been
>received from each and every author and contributor.
> 
>If you are on the RTGWG email list but are not listed as an author or
>contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of any
>IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules.
>
>Thanks,
>Jeff & Chris
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email