IETF Logo Mail Archive

RE: RTGWG IPR poll draft-ietf-rtgwg-routing-types

Yingzhen Qu <yingzhen.qu@huawei.com> Fri, 16 June 2017 20:06 UTC

Return-Path: <yingzhen.qu@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AE99127078; Fri, 16 Jun 2017 13:06:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.222
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.222 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JfZ_3ddUTYPE; Fri, 16 Jun 2017 13:06:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 069D9126DD9; Fri, 16 Jun 2017 13:06:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml704-cah.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id DIQ54122; Fri, 16 Jun 2017 20:06:36 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from DFWEML701-CAH.china.huawei.com (10.193.5.175) by lhreml704-cah.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.45) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.301.0; Fri, 16 Jun 2017 21:06:35 +0100
Received: from DFWEML501-MBX.china.huawei.com ([10.193.5.178]) by dfweml701-cah.china.huawei.com ([10.193.5.175]) with mapi id 14.03.0301.000; Fri, 16 Jun 2017 13:06:29 -0700
From: Yingzhen Qu <yingzhen.qu@huawei.com>
To: Xufeng Liu <Xufeng_Liu@jabil.com>, Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com>, RTGWG <rtgwg@ietf.org>
CC: rtgwg-chairs <rtgwg-chairs@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-rtgwg-routing-types@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-rtgwg-routing-types@ietf.org>
Subject: RE: RTGWG IPR poll draft-ietf-rtgwg-routing-types
Thread-Topic: RTGWG IPR poll draft-ietf-rtgwg-routing-types
Thread-Index: AQHS5Cp12ihxffvfZkeNecw0iiDaOaIjUrOAgASc+OA=
Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2017 20:06:29 +0000
Message-ID: <594D005A3CB0724DB547CF3E9A9E810B3EF092@dfweml501-mbx>
References: <61F864E7-3262-4371-B09E-6A3DD06B7BB8@gmail.com> <BN3PR0201MB0867C6E6FA4254D16DF22D25F1C20@BN3PR0201MB0867.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <BN3PR0201MB0867C6E6FA4254D16DF22D25F1C20@BN3PR0201MB0867.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.213.49.55]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
X-Mirapoint-Virus-RAPID-Raw: score=unknown(0), refid=str=0001.0A020202.59443A4D.00A6, ss=1, re=0.000, recu=0.000, reip=0.000, cl=1, cld=1, fgs=0, ip=0.0.0.0, so=2013-06-18 04:22:30, dmn=2013-03-21 17:37:32
X-Mirapoint-Loop-Id: 3af1dc09b22d1c77e6d8a2dec7142350
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtgwg/w5ibrsGEaeNhkFOePg0TqqgnIi8>
X-BeenThere: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Working Group <rtgwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtgwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2017 20:06:42 -0000

I am not aware of any IPR that applies to draft-ietf-rtgwg-routing-types.

Thanks,
Yingzhen

-----Original Message-----
From: Xufeng Liu [mailto:Xufeng_Liu@jabil.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2017 7:39 AM
To: Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com>; RTGWG <rtgwg@ietf.org>
Cc: rtgwg-chairs <rtgwg-chairs@ietf.org>; draft-ietf-rtgwg-routing-types@ietf.org
Subject: RE: RTGWG IPR poll draft-ietf-rtgwg-routing-types

I am not aware of any IPR that applies to draft-ietf-rtgwg-routing-types.

Thanks,
- Xufeng

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jeff Tantsura [mailto:jefftant.ietf@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2017 5:36 AM
> To: RTGWG <rtgwg@ietf.org>
> Cc: rtgwg-chairs <rtgwg-chairs@ietf.org>; draft-ietf-rtgwg-routing- 
> types@ietf.org
> Subject: RTGWG IPR poll draft-ietf-rtgwg-routing-types
> 
> Dear RTGWG,
> 
> The authors of draft-ietf-rtgwg-routing-types believe that the draft 
> is ready for working group last call (WGLC).
> 
> Before we do the WGLC we want to do the IPR poll on the draft.
> 
> This email is to start the IPR poll.
> 
> Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft-ietf-rtgwg-routing-types?
> 
> If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules 
> (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).
> 
> 
> If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond 
> to this email regardless of whether or not you are aware of any 
> relevant IPR. *The response needs to be sent to the RTGWG mailing 
> list.* The document will not advance to the next stage until a 
> response has been received from each and every author and contributor.
> 
> If you are on the RTGWG email list but are not listed as an author or 
> contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of 
> any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules.
> 
> Thanks,
> Jeff & Chris
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email