IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: RTGWG IPR poll draft-ietf-rtgwg-routing-types

Christian Hopps <chopps@chopps.org> Tue, 13 June 2017 12:16 UTC

Return-Path: <chopps@chopps.org>
X-Original-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 202C413169E; Tue, 13 Jun 2017 05:16:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DAlBTj3wMx-t; Tue, 13 Jun 2017 05:16:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.chopps.org (smtp.chopps.org [54.88.81.56]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4925C12E05D; Tue, 13 Jun 2017 05:16:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tops.chopps.org (47-50-69-38.static.klmz.mi.charter.com [47.50.69.38]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by smtp.chopps.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A6FC2623AD; Tue, 13 Jun 2017 12:16:42 +0000 (UTC)
References: <61F864E7-3262-4371-B09E-6A3DD06B7BB8@gmail.com>
User-agent: mu4e 0.9.18; emacs 25.1.1
From: Christian Hopps <chopps@chopps.org>
To: Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com>
Cc: RTGWG <rtgwg@ietf.org>, rtgwg-chairs <rtgwg-chairs@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-rtgwg-routing-types@ietf.org
Subject: Re: RTGWG IPR poll draft-ietf-rtgwg-routing-types
In-reply-to: <61F864E7-3262-4371-B09E-6A3DD06B7BB8@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2017 08:16:41 -0400
Message-ID: <87y3swhyl2.fsf@chopps.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtgwg/baddSfjVHipYO4vP9zmWKQFslFY>
X-BeenThere: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Working Group <rtgwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtgwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2017 12:16:48 -0000

Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com> writes:

> Dear RTGWG,
>
> The authors of draft-ietf-rtgwg-routing-types believe that the
> draft is ready for working group last call (WGLC).
>
> Before we do the WGLC we want to do the IPR poll on the draft.
>
> This email is to start the IPR poll.
>
> Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft-ietf-rtgwg-routing-types?

I am not aware of any IPR that applies to
draft-ietf-rtgwg-routing-types.

Thanks,
Chris.

>
> If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
> (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).
>
>
> If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond to
> this email regardless of whether or not you are aware of any relevant
> IPR. *The response needs to be sent to the RTGWG mailing list.* The
> document will not advance to the next stage until a response has been
> received from each and every author and contributor.
>
> If you are on the RTGWG email list but are not listed as an author or
> contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of any
> IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules.
>
> Thanks,
> Jeff & Chris

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email