Re: IPR Claims related to draft-ietf-rtgwg-mofrr

"Alvaro Retana (aretana)" <aretana@cisco.com> Fri, 14 March 2014 10:13 UTC

Return-Path: <aretana@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2361C1A00EF for <rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 14 Mar 2014 03:13:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.047
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.047 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.547, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YOMtIQj-sp8L for <rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 14 Mar 2014 03:13:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-1.cisco.com (alln-iport-1.cisco.com [173.37.142.88]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE7FA1A00EA for <rtgwg@ietf.org>; Fri, 14 Mar 2014 03:13:51 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=3450; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1394792025; x=1396001625; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=qFKg+NSNITX1N+HCeyOb1xKxOMmRWm+VsMnkdNDwC5c=; b=cRpySkidogRwZb9XJZaHcKmK+k7fsVQjSxT93JN6j4QWJEkK3ZCIVcsN MbUTsXZ7jR3MFugIMEmnFJ/xNyGzUahSghf7V/sdut1oY8GldQzLDnLuN J/S2d6/d9gbcRrgFRj9i8aArnBLGePBZVDMEJa3uU0NHGBjClOpvxNAZ/ 0=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Am8HADzVIlOtJV2a/2dsb2JhbABZgkJEO1eEJLReiGuBGRZ0giYBAQR5EAIBCAQ7BzIUEQIEAQ0Fh3kN00gXjmEEB4Q4BJhFgTKQfIMtgis
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="4.97,653,1389744000"; d="scan'208,217"; a="27454827"
Received: from rcdn-core-3.cisco.com ([173.37.93.154]) by alln-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 14 Mar 2014 10:13:44 +0000
Received: from xhc-aln-x09.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x09.cisco.com [173.36.12.83]) by rcdn-core-3.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s2EADicK019473 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Fri, 14 Mar 2014 10:13:44 GMT
Received: from xmb-aln-x15.cisco.com ([169.254.9.3]) by xhc-aln-x09.cisco.com ([173.36.12.83]) with mapi id 14.03.0123.003; Fri, 14 Mar 2014 05:13:44 -0500
From: "Alvaro Retana (aretana)" <aretana@cisco.com>
To: "bruno.decraene@orange.com" <bruno.decraene@orange.com>, "draft-ietf-rtgwg-mofrr@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-rtgwg-mofrr@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: IPR Claims related to draft-ietf-rtgwg-mofrr
Thread-Topic: IPR Claims related to draft-ietf-rtgwg-mofrr
Thread-Index: AQHPPz9L2w2bbTUN3EO+tBGO/aSUWprgUjfQgAAcNAA=
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2014 10:13:43 +0000
Message-ID: <CF484E50.50B6E%aretana@cisco.com>
References: <CF480018.50946%aretana@cisco.com> <10099_1394789773_5322CD8D_10099_9050_1_53C29892C857584299CBF5D05346208A07118F6A@PEXCVZYM11.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
In-Reply-To: <10099_1394789773_5322CD8D_10099_9050_1_53C29892C857584299CBF5D05346208A07118F6A@PEXCVZYM11.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.150.72.28]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_CF484E5050B6Earetanaciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtgwg/nmsZJlgIo_5XzfUbB4n8E3cbDYU
Cc: "rtgwg@ietf.org" <rtgwg@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Working Group <rtgwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtgwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2014 10:13:54 -0000

On 3/14/14 5:36 AM, "bruno.decraene@orange.com<mailto:bruno.decraene@orange.com>" <bruno.decraene@orange.com<mailto:bruno.decraene@orange.com>> wrote:

Speaking of disclosed IPR, http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-rtgwg-mofrr does not indicate the below IPR. I assume that this is because the IETF datatracker does not know that draft-ietf-rtgwg-mofrr-00 replaces draft-karan-mofrr-02  (which has the IPR disclosed).

I think that's a bug in the draft page..because the data tracker does know that one replaced the other and it does show the IPR here:

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rtgwg-mofrr/

The important thing is that we're aware of it.

Thanks!

Alvaro.