[Rum] Erik Kline's No Objection on draft-ietf-rum-rue-09: (with COMMENT)
Erik Kline via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Sat, 11 December 2021 07:04 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: rum@ietf.org
Delivered-To: rum@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFB893A0922; Fri, 10 Dec 2021 23:04:48 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Erik Kline via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-rum-rue@ietf.org, rum-chairs@ietf.org, rum@ietf.org, pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu, pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 7.41.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Erik Kline <ek.ietf@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <163920628875.27251.17036356913022296501@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2021 23:04:48 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rum/JIBWVsa_SS39yd1Ox71HWsQqKlY>
Subject: [Rum] Erik Kline's No Objection on draft-ietf-rum-rue-09: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: rum@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Relay User Machine <rum.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rum>, <mailto:rum-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rum/>
List-Post: <mailto:rum@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rum-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rum>, <mailto:rum-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2021 07:04:49 -0000
Erik Kline has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-rum-rue-09: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/blog/handling-iesg-ballot-positions/ for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rum-rue/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- [S5; nit] * Both RFCs 6655 and 6665 are mentioned. I think the 6655 reference should actually be to 6665 (unless "AES-CCM Cipher Suites for TLS" is of specific importance). [S6; nit] * W.R.T.: "Mandatory to Implement" means a conforming implementation must implement the specified capability. It seems like, since 8174 is in use, this "must" might be a "MUST", to avoid any ambiguity.
- [Rum] Erik Kline's No Objection on draft-ietf-rum… Erik Kline via Datatracker
- Re: [Rum] Erik Kline's No Objection on draft-ietf… Brian Rosen