Re: [saag] Ubiquitous Encryption: spam filtering

Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com> Tue, 23 June 2015 16:11 UTC

Return-Path: <nico@cryptonector.com>
X-Original-To: saag@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: saag@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A96881ACDE7 for <saag@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Jun 2015 09:11:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.233
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.233 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_40=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id W7wJq5sqFsBj for <saag@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Jun 2015 09:11:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from homiemail-a24.g.dreamhost.com (sub4.mail.dreamhost.com [69.163.253.135]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EFB61ACDE6 for <saag@ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Jun 2015 09:11:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from homiemail-a24.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by homiemail-a24.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC50D2C80A0; Tue, 23 Jun 2015 09:11:55 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=cryptonector.com; h=date :from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:in-reply-to; s=cryptonector.com; bh=Z153r4pkbX5ljM qBVtRdCL9mZJs=; b=nWT3H9756d7mXLuMkgs3G2nBM606vli5T0JBvTeH+MckMe LeSBxRbKeOTW7n4vWtE3qZeRDv3wjTBhRPHZSeQXMcdC1GVQ0viStB1uA9sUmfxe SwD+ZBnJoCJPT1huyecTwkUNQUca4nG+4axronGbsbiVm1NGbkY///b66GI2A=
Received: from localhost (108-207-244-174.lightspeed.austtx.sbcglobal.net [108.207.244.174]) (Authenticated sender: nico@cryptonector.com) by homiemail-a24.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 226952C8094; Tue, 23 Jun 2015 09:11:55 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2015 11:11:53 -0500
From: Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com>
To: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
Message-ID: <20150623161153.GV6117@localhost>
References: <20150623151902.89304.qmail@ary.lan>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20150623151902.89304.qmail@ary.lan>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/saag/wMTX0mpbuAv3ze3z_qiD6ueQfSY>
Cc: saag@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [saag] Ubiquitous Encryption: spam filtering
X-BeenThere: saag@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Advisory Group <saag.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/saag>, <mailto:saag-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/saag/>
List-Post: <mailto:saag@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:saag-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/saag>, <mailto:saag-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2015 16:11:56 -0000

On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 03:19:02PM -0000, John Levine wrote:
> I can't find in the archives whether the ubiquitous encryption
> discussion has looked at the knotty issues of spam filtering.
> 
> It's a really hard problem -- filtering is essential to keep mail
> usable, both due to the sheer volume of the spam and the need to keep
> phishing and malware away from recipients.  You can do some filtering
> on the envelope, but there's no substitute for looking at the contents
> of the message.
> 
> All of the middlebox issues apply, it's much easier to do the
> filtering on a large shared server than at endpoints.  [...]

I agree.  E-mail is different from web.