Re: [saag] Liking Linkability

Mouse <mouse@Rodents-Montreal.ORG> Thu, 18 October 2012 19:04 UTC

Return-Path: <mouse@Sparkle.Rodents-Montreal.ORG>
X-Original-To: saag@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: saag@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6BEC21F852A for <saag@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Oct 2012 12:04:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.988
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.988 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_MISMATCH_ORG=0.611, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0siVT4s8SwVs for <saag@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Oct 2012 12:04:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Sparkle.Rodents-Montreal.ORG (Sparkle.Rodents-Montreal.ORG [216.46.5.7]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6E4D21F854F for <saag@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Oct 2012 12:04:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from mouse@localhost) by Sparkle.Rodents-Montreal.ORG (8.8.8/8.8.8) id PAA07773; Thu, 18 Oct 2012 15:04:25 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2012 15:04:25 -0400 (EDT)
From: Mouse <mouse@Rodents-Montreal.ORG>
Message-Id: <201210181904.PAA07773@Sparkle.Rodents-Montreal.ORG>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Erik-Conspiracy: There is no Conspiracy - and if there were I wouldn't be part of it anyway.
X-Message-Flag: Microsoft: the company who gave us the botnet zombies.
X-Composition-Start-Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2012 14:54:36 -0400 (EDT)
To: Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf@mit.edu>, "public-identity@w3.org" <public-identity@w3.org>, "saag@ietf.org" <saag@ietf.org>, "public-privacy@w3.org" <public-privacy@w3.org>, "public-philoweb@w3.org" <public-philoweb@w3.org>, "public-webid@w3.org" <public-webid@w3.org>
In-Reply-To: <tslzk3jsjv8.fsf@mit.edu>
References: <CCA5E789.2083A%Josh.Howlett@ja.net> <tslzk3jsjv8.fsf@mit.edu>
Subject: Re: [saag] Liking Linkability
X-BeenThere: saag@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Advisory Group <saag.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/saag>, <mailto:saag-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/saag>
List-Post: <mailto:saag@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:saag-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/saag>, <mailto:saag-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2012 19:04:50 -0000

> [...]
> Unfortunately, I think that's too high of a price to pay for
> unlinkability.
> So I've come to the conclusion that anonymity will depend on
> protocols like TOR specifically designed for it.

Is it my imagination, or is this stuff confusing anonymity with
pseudonymity?  I feel reasonably sure I've missed some of the thread,
but what I have seem does seem to be confusing the two.

This whole thing about linking, for example, seems to be based on
linking identities of some sort, implying that the systems in question
*have* identities, in which case they are (at best) pseudonymous, not
anonymous.

/~\ The ASCII				  Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
 X  Against HTML		mouse@rodents-montreal.org
/ \ Email!	     7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39  4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B