IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [sacm] Consensus call on SACM WG way forward (March 2021)

Adam Montville <adam.montville.sdo@gmail.com> Wed, 10 March 2021 17:14 UTC

Return-Path: <adam.montville.sdo@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: sacm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sacm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BBDC3A13EA for <sacm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 09:14:31 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id StjaUgyvtS16 for <sacm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 09:14:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ot1-x32c.google.com (mail-ot1-x32c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::32c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0A4A33A13E6 for <sacm@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 09:14:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ot1-x32c.google.com with SMTP id 75so13841796otn.4 for <sacm@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 09:14:29 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=dVXPD0+6g56RbXNV0o+/bNq1UrNasoLVGY7cK3Kz04I=; b=XS+K5lYqCP5hDQP1/41zkN6cMZMWFcJ4Ei4ge7S3rSTBtrp3LmMAbgnhb8hs79WND6 F+iJ/JMFu/CI/hd6wOxu05CpWwxr8cbLXKUFSsOURrfpl8LcFv9YTyt63oCf9TC194sI W+MvGoqCFLAWeMJshRMKw9PiCR2MMjDA1nTkyllE/hlZktS439KhikmU0d4iVN/lhkv6 tI0eYt8IyxPOyopmY1ndivJwIncvpui0Bm4LKael1e4066IzHE9aJg4wqgvUI5BeP26+ u/lewE+ORVc7YTH3ssGJaEpQQxZkgMDfwytUJtwSQ9YPGK5aAxLuQksnNgrdzSt/JJU5 yEQg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=dVXPD0+6g56RbXNV0o+/bNq1UrNasoLVGY7cK3Kz04I=; b=F2qY8bR2a0y5IFUCFw+JUHpv6p68g6nYa/N+P/5CN5WoLwAYX1ejuG9CxQaGYdKE6F nTH5Di9LENm1LSRL33BWnDCud5xk2b0xJavGZ49KjHDK8QY+QkL4Ya8VTaKDizFddfiI l3ZkyVaf3un8cnRNdweoOCM14sr+W/HrRvoRL9M/mkaWoCL6sL4+tSrFkRwQleq5379Q bAOr7CM1YK9Vr6MYnTrMpc6s5O3LnY9w2X4C0XA1xEkW6tGMA1ZQTkqkep8bpsW/6aKU e+lMNzNP8T6FiUOUD95Uf6ItuNpjn8mLWeNAsy3/GYVWkbGw8syTEAw27+JrgCElgjRX hizw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5332/PC/7/SZCE+24xj7zA0OBr9tJJzOhkqLwuLibGB1r6vbELNU iRjmRuzcG6ux57qskT79E3E=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyYdVjCVTkzdrhbslUawnau405LrcL0CamCtd8XXH+GLsfPYgMOBdUZbXjYplzQRm4JeY5I2w==
X-Received: by 2002:a9d:2006:: with SMTP id n6mr2123693ota.348.1615396468163; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 09:14:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mbkpro-2043-amontville.lan (cpe-70-121-86-117.austin.res.rr.com. [70.121.86.117]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z32sm38155ota.81.2021.03.10.09.14.27 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 10 Mar 2021 09:14:27 -0800 (PST)
From: Adam Montville <adam.montville.sdo@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <D1D277AA-81B0-4D5A-AA4C-D83E3FABF85C@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_1B69E589-94B0-4E70-997E-C1FF5299BC98"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.4\))
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2021 11:14:26 -0600
In-Reply-To: <CO6PR06MB70588EA9A40AA42F537D0FF8C2919@CO6PR06MB7058.namprd06.prod.outlook.com>
Cc: "sacm@ietf.org" <sacm@ietf.org>
To: Karen O'Donoghue <odonoghue@isoc.org>
References: <CO6PR06MB70588EA9A40AA42F537D0FF8C2919@CO6PR06MB7058.namprd06.prod.outlook.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.4)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sacm/b53k1Ot32Sn7A8Hv13XrBmvgNNc>
Subject: Re: [sacm] Consensus call on SACM WG way forward (March 2021)
X-BeenThere: sacm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: SACM WG mail list <sacm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sacm>, <mailto:sacm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sacm/>
List-Post: <mailto:sacm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sacm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sacm>, <mailto:sacm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2021 17:14:32 -0000

+1

> On Mar 10, 2021, at 8:55 AM, Karen O'Donoghue <odonoghue@isoc.org> wrote:
> 
> SACM WG members, 
>  
> During today’s SACM WG meeting, we discussed a way ahead for the SACM working group. The proposal that we settled on is: 
>  
> Drop all the milestones which aren’t CoSWID or Architecture related
> Revise the milestone on SACM Architecture to be “Submit SACM Architecture to IESG” by December 2021
> Add a milestone “Close or re-charter WG if all planned milestones have not progressed to at least the IESG” by January 2022 
> This email initiates a one week consensus call on this way forward. This will give the working group members that were not present a chance to review the chair slides that discussed the motivation, the meeting recording, and the meeting minutes (which should be posted later today). 
>  
> Please indicate on the mailing list your opinion on this way forward. This consensus call will close on next Friday at 19 March 2021. 
>  
> Regards,
> Karen and Chris
>  
> _______________________________________________
> sacm mailing list
> sacm@ietf.org <mailto:sacm@ietf.org>
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sacm <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sacm>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email