[salud] Moving forward with the draft

worley@ariadne.com (Dale R. Worley) Fri, 18 October 2013 20:45 UTC

Return-Path: <worley@shell01.TheWorld.com>
X-Original-To: salud@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: salud@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A48311E81C3 for <salud@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 18 Oct 2013 13:45:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.813
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.813 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.167, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB=0.619]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fWkq5KNIbc69 for <salud@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 18 Oct 2013 13:45:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from TheWorld.com (pcls6.std.com [192.74.137.146]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0384211E8345 for <salud@ietf.org>; Fri, 18 Oct 2013 13:45:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from shell.TheWorld.com (root@shell01.theworld.com [192.74.137.71]) by TheWorld.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r9IKi4eL025568 for <salud@ietf.org>; Fri, 18 Oct 2013 16:44:06 -0400
Received: from shell01.TheWorld.com (localhost.theworld.com [127.0.0.1]) by shell.TheWorld.com (8.13.6/8.12.8) with ESMTP id r9IKi38Z3175948 for <salud@ietf.org>; Fri, 18 Oct 2013 16:44:03 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from worley@localhost) by shell01.TheWorld.com (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id r9IKi3VM3219677; Fri, 18 Oct 2013 16:44:03 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2013 16:44:03 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <201310182044.r9IKi3VM3219677@shell01.TheWorld.com>
From: worley@ariadne.com (Dale R. Worley)
Sender: worley@ariadne.com (Dale R. Worley)
To: salud@ietf.org
Subject: [salud] Moving forward with the draft
X-BeenThere: salud@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Sip ALerting for User Devices working group discussion list <salud.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/salud>, <mailto:salud-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/salud>
List-Post: <mailto:salud@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:salud-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/salud>, <mailto:salud-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2013 20:45:23 -0000

[as chair]

It is my belief that we have resolved all outstanding issues with the
draft, excepting as detailed below.

The revised URN namespace definition has received no comments from the
URN-NID mailing list.  I have been unable to contact Alfred Hoenes, so
presumably we will hear no objections from him.

The other issues that I've known about I have filed in the issue
tracker.  The list can be found at
http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/salud/trac/report/1?asc=1&sort=ticket

I believe that all of these issues have been fixed and discussed on
the mailing list, with the possible exception of #6, 'Better
explanation of "delay"'
(http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/salud/trac/ticket/6).  But looking at
section 3.1.6 and the changes to section 6.2.5
(http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url1=draft-ietf-salud-alert-info-urns-07&url2=draft-ietf-salud-alert-info-urns-08)-08),
I believe that that issue has been resolved as well.

The only additional issue that I know of is that we haven't listed
Alfred in the Acknowledgments section.

If everyone agrees that there are no issues that I have not listed, I
propose that we:

- Produce a -09 version, listing Alfred in the Acknowledgments.

- Proceed to WGLC

- I search for a Document Shepherd to submit the draft to the IESG.

What do you think?

Dale